Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations
Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2023 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Middle East Fertility Society journal - [S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004, 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:28 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; day:08 ; month:03 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR049610716 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR049610716 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230323105007.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230323s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR049610716 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2023 | ||
| 520 | |a Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a IVF laboratory |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Embryologists |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Laboratory procedural processes |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a IVF laboratories errors |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Risk assessment |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Error mitigation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mohammed, Chand |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Malhotra, Keshav |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Middle East Fertility Society journal |d [S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004 |g 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März |w (DE-627)494831642 |w (DE-600)2196955-3 |x 2090-3251 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:08 |g month:03 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 08 |c 03 | ||
| author_variant |
c w i cw cwi c m cm k m km |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:20903251:2023----::rosnvlbrtrerssseset |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| allfields |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 doi (DE-627)SPR049610716 (SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266 aut Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. IVF laboratory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Embryologists (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laboratory procedural processes (dpeaa)DE-He213 IVF laboratories errors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Error mitigation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mohammed, Chand aut Malhotra, Keshav aut Enthalten in Middle East Fertility Society journal [S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März (DE-627)494831642 (DE-600)2196955-3 2090-3251 nnns volume:28 year:2023 number:1 day:08 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 28 2023 1 08 03 |
| spelling |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 doi (DE-627)SPR049610716 (SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266 aut Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. IVF laboratory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Embryologists (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laboratory procedural processes (dpeaa)DE-He213 IVF laboratories errors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Error mitigation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mohammed, Chand aut Malhotra, Keshav aut Enthalten in Middle East Fertility Society journal [S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März (DE-627)494831642 (DE-600)2196955-3 2090-3251 nnns volume:28 year:2023 number:1 day:08 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 28 2023 1 08 03 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 doi (DE-627)SPR049610716 (SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266 aut Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. IVF laboratory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Embryologists (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laboratory procedural processes (dpeaa)DE-He213 IVF laboratories errors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Error mitigation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mohammed, Chand aut Malhotra, Keshav aut Enthalten in Middle East Fertility Society journal [S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März (DE-627)494831642 (DE-600)2196955-3 2090-3251 nnns volume:28 year:2023 number:1 day:08 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 28 2023 1 08 03 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 doi (DE-627)SPR049610716 (SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266 aut Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. IVF laboratory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Embryologists (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laboratory procedural processes (dpeaa)DE-He213 IVF laboratories errors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Error mitigation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mohammed, Chand aut Malhotra, Keshav aut Enthalten in Middle East Fertility Society journal [S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März (DE-627)494831642 (DE-600)2196955-3 2090-3251 nnns volume:28 year:2023 number:1 day:08 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 28 2023 1 08 03 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 doi (DE-627)SPR049610716 (SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266 aut Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. IVF laboratory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Embryologists (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laboratory procedural processes (dpeaa)DE-He213 IVF laboratories errors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Error mitigation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mohammed, Chand aut Malhotra, Keshav aut Enthalten in Middle East Fertility Society journal [S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März (DE-627)494831642 (DE-600)2196955-3 2090-3251 nnns volume:28 year:2023 number:1 day:08 month:03 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 28 2023 1 08 03 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Middle East Fertility Society journal 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März volume:28 year:2023 number:1 day:08 month:03 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Middle East Fertility Society journal 28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März volume:28 year:2023 number:1 day:08 month:03 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
IVF laboratory Embryologists Laboratory procedural processes IVF laboratories errors Risk assessment Error mitigation |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Middle East Fertility Society journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams @@aut@@ Mohammed, Chand @@aut@@ Malhotra, Keshav @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-03-08T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
494831642 |
| id |
SPR049610716 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR049610716</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230323105007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230323s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR049610716</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IVF laboratory</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Embryologists</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laboratory procedural processes</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IVF laboratories errors</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Error mitigation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammed, Chand</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malhotra, Keshav</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Middle East Fertility Society journal</subfield><subfield code="d">[S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)494831642</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2196955-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2090-3251</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams |
| spellingShingle |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams misc IVF laboratory misc Embryologists misc Laboratory procedural processes misc IVF laboratories errors misc Risk assessment misc Error mitigation Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations |
| authorStr |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)494831642 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2090-3251 |
| topic_title |
Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations IVF laboratory (dpeaa)DE-He213 Embryologists (dpeaa)DE-He213 Laboratory procedural processes (dpeaa)DE-He213 IVF laboratories errors (dpeaa)DE-He213 Risk assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Error mitigation (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc IVF laboratory misc Embryologists misc Laboratory procedural processes misc IVF laboratories errors misc Risk assessment misc Error mitigation |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc IVF laboratory misc Embryologists misc Laboratory procedural processes misc IVF laboratories errors misc Risk assessment misc Error mitigation |
| topic_browse |
misc IVF laboratory misc Embryologists misc Laboratory procedural processes misc IVF laboratories errors misc Risk assessment misc Error mitigation |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Middle East Fertility Society journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
494831642 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Middle East Fertility Society journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)494831642 (DE-600)2196955-3 |
| title |
Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR049610716 (SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e |
| title_full |
Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations |
| author_sort |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams |
| journal |
Middle East Fertility Society journal |
| journalStr |
Middle East Fertility Society journal |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2023 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams Mohammed, Chand Malhotra, Keshav |
| container_volume |
28 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-6100-8266 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266 |
| title_sort |
errors in ivf laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations |
| title_auth |
Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations |
| abstract |
Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. © The Author(s) 2023 |
| abstractGer |
Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. © The Author(s) 2023 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject. © The Author(s) 2023 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mohammed, Chand Malhotra, Keshav |
| author2Str |
Mohammed, Chand Malhotra, Keshav |
| ppnlink |
494831642 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:32:42.968Z |
| _version_ |
1803610240289079296 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR049610716</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230323105007.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230323s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR049610716</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s43043-023-00130-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ifenatuoha, Chibuzor Williams</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6100-8266</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Errors in IVF laboratories: risks assessments and mitigations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has positively impacted the field of human reproduction. Over the years, ART procedures have evolved to include several complex techniques, associated with various risks of errors and failure opportunities, especially in laboratories. IVF-associated errors, although rare, have significant implications. Patients may be psychologically affected, given the emotional attachment associated with IVF treatments. Most of these errors are associated with humans and/or systemic failure. Methods In this article, we used the Google Scholar database to search for related peer-reviewed original and review articles. Search keywords were “IVF laboratory”, “the embryologist”, “laboratory error”, “IVF laboratory errors”, “IVF error prevalence”, “risks of IVF error”, “consequences/ repercussion, IVF errors”, “risk assessment”, and “risk mitigation”. All studies were extensively evaluated. Findings There is a need for an effective approach toward improving existing risk management systems and, possibly, developing better risk management models that can eliminate these errors. Because laboratory resources (equipment and human expertise) are finite and are dependent on systemic policies, error mitigation must involve a multidimensional approach. This review includes several of these error-mitigating strategies as well as innovative technologies that may provide practical approaches to improve error surveillance, reporting, management, and potentially, eradication. Furthermore, errors in IVF laboratories threaten the integrity of the IVF processes and pose significant implications, which are often negative. Conclusion This review highlights those errors and the stages they occur during the IVF process. Recommendations Understanding the risks of errors in IVF laboratories can help embryologists develop better approaches to identify, evaluate the causes, and prevent errors in the laboratory. Essentially, the practice of effective risks assessment and management can help reinforce patients’ trust in the clinics and prevent repercussions such as litigations and many more. More laboratories can also begin reporting even minor errors to curb the scarce data in this subject.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IVF laboratory</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Embryologists</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Laboratory procedural processes</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">IVF laboratories errors</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Risk assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Error mitigation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammed, Chand</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malhotra, Keshav</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Middle East Fertility Society journal</subfield><subfield code="d">[S.l.] : Elsevier, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2023), 1 vom: 08. März</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)494831642</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2196955-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2090-3251</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:03</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43043-023-00130-0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">03</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399907 |