Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes
Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of vibration engineering & technologies - Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018, 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2022 ; number:2 ; day:09 ; month:07 ; pages:699-719 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR049861603 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR049861603 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230328064846.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230328s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR049861603 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fahimi Farzam, Maziar |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Tuned mass damper |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Optimum design |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sensitivity analysis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Far-field |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Near-field |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Maroofiazar, Rasool |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of vibration engineering & technologies |d Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018 |g 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 |w (DE-627)1030123837 |w (DE-600)2941414-3 |x 2523-3939 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g day:09 |g month:07 |g pages:699-719 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 11 |j 2022 |e 2 |b 09 |c 07 |h 699-719 | ||
| author_variant |
f m f fm fmf b m c bm bmc r m rm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:25233939:2022----::fiinynrbsnsootmlyeinduemsdmesomdnhgrsbidns |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x doi (DE-627)SPR049861603 (SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fahimi Farzam, Maziar verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186 aut Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. Tuned mass damper (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimum design (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitivity analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Far-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Near-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad aut Maroofiazar, Rasool aut Enthalten in Journal of vibration engineering & technologies Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 (DE-627)1030123837 (DE-600)2941414-3 2523-3939 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:2 day:09 month:07 pages:699-719 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 2 09 07 699-719 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x doi (DE-627)SPR049861603 (SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fahimi Farzam, Maziar verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186 aut Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. Tuned mass damper (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimum design (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitivity analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Far-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Near-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad aut Maroofiazar, Rasool aut Enthalten in Journal of vibration engineering & technologies Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 (DE-627)1030123837 (DE-600)2941414-3 2523-3939 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:2 day:09 month:07 pages:699-719 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 2 09 07 699-719 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x doi (DE-627)SPR049861603 (SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fahimi Farzam, Maziar verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186 aut Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. Tuned mass damper (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimum design (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitivity analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Far-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Near-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad aut Maroofiazar, Rasool aut Enthalten in Journal of vibration engineering & technologies Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 (DE-627)1030123837 (DE-600)2941414-3 2523-3939 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:2 day:09 month:07 pages:699-719 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 2 09 07 699-719 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x doi (DE-627)SPR049861603 (SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fahimi Farzam, Maziar verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186 aut Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. Tuned mass damper (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimum design (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitivity analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Far-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Near-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad aut Maroofiazar, Rasool aut Enthalten in Journal of vibration engineering & technologies Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 (DE-627)1030123837 (DE-600)2941414-3 2523-3939 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:2 day:09 month:07 pages:699-719 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 2 09 07 699-719 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x doi (DE-627)SPR049861603 (SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fahimi Farzam, Maziar verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186 aut Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. Tuned mass damper (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimum design (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitivity analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Far-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Near-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad aut Maroofiazar, Rasool aut Enthalten in Journal of vibration engineering & technologies Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 (DE-627)1030123837 (DE-600)2941414-3 2523-3939 nnns volume:11 year:2022 number:2 day:09 month:07 pages:699-719 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2022 2 09 07 699-719 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of vibration engineering & technologies 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 volume:11 year:2022 number:2 day:09 month:07 pages:699-719 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of vibration engineering & technologies 11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719 volume:11 year:2022 number:2 day:09 month:07 pages:699-719 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Tuned mass damper Optimum design Sensitivity analysis Far-field Near-field |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Journal of vibration engineering & technologies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar @@aut@@ Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad @@aut@@ Maroofiazar, Rasool @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-07-09T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1030123837 |
| id |
SPR049861603 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR049861603</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328064846.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230328s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR049861603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fahimi Farzam, Maziar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tuned mass damper</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optimum design</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sensitivity analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Far-field</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Near-field</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maroofiazar, Rasool</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of vibration engineering & technologies</subfield><subfield code="d">Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1030123837</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2941414-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2523-3939</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:09</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:699-719</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">09</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">699-719</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar |
| spellingShingle |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar misc Tuned mass damper misc Optimum design misc Sensitivity analysis misc Far-field misc Near-field Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes |
| authorStr |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1030123837 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2523-3939 |
| topic_title |
Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes Tuned mass damper (dpeaa)DE-He213 Optimum design (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sensitivity analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Far-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 Near-field (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Tuned mass damper misc Optimum design misc Sensitivity analysis misc Far-field misc Near-field |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Tuned mass damper misc Optimum design misc Sensitivity analysis misc Far-field misc Near-field |
| topic_browse |
misc Tuned mass damper misc Optimum design misc Sensitivity analysis misc Far-field misc Near-field |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of vibration engineering & technologies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1030123837 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of vibration engineering & technologies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1030123837 (DE-600)2941414-3 |
| title |
Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR049861603 (SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e |
| title_full |
Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes |
| author_sort |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar |
| journal |
Journal of vibration engineering & technologies |
| journalStr |
Journal of vibration engineering & technologies |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
699 |
| author_browse |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad Maroofiazar, Rasool |
| container_volume |
11 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Fahimi Farzam, Maziar |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-9635-8186 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186 |
| title_sort |
efficiency and robustness of optimally designed tuned mass dampers for mid- and high-rise buildings under far and near-field earthquakes |
| title_auth |
Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes |
| abstract |
Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 |
| abstractGer |
Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper. © Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad Maroofiazar, Rasool |
| author2Str |
Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad Maroofiazar, Rasool |
| ppnlink |
1030123837 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T02:34:36.535Z |
| _version_ |
1803614134245261312 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR049861603</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230328064846.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230328s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR049861603</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s42417-022-00604-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fahimi Farzam, Maziar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9635-8186</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Krishtel eMaging Solutions Private Limited 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose The efficiency and robustness of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are the two main criteria in the optimum design and evaluation of their seismic performance. In this study, a framework is presented for optimum seismic design and assessment of TMD performance in frequency and time domains based on efficiency and robustness. Material and methods Two 10- and 20-story linear shear buildings have been studied, which represent mid- and high-rise buildings, respectively, with two inherent damping ratios (2% and 5%) to evaluate the performance of TMDs in this framework. The TMD design has also been investigated for seven different mass ratios. The Particle Swarm Optimization method has been used to determine the optimal parameters of each damper, and the objective function is considered as minimizing the largest singular value of the inter-story drift transfer function to ensure the seismic performance and robustness of the TMD. In addition, three sets of seven earthquake records have been applied with different characteristics to evaluate the robustness of the TMD regarding the stochastic nature of the earthquake. Finally, to explicitly assess the robustness of optimally designed TMD with other uncertainties in the dynamic properties of the building and TMD, two sensitivity analyses have been performed in the frequency and time domain to achieve an unbiased seismic evaluation of optimally designed TMDs. Conclusion The results show the good performance of the damper with optimum parameters but its high sensitivity to the uncertainty of frequency ratio, especially in the time domain, can significantly reduce the seismic performance of the damper.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tuned mass damper</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Optimum design</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sensitivity analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Far-field</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Near-field</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Charkhtab Basim, Mohammad</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maroofiazar, Rasool</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of vibration engineering & technologies</subfield><subfield code="d">Singapore : Springer Singapore, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2022), 2 vom: 09. Juli, Seite 699-719</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1030123837</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2941414-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2523-3939</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">day:09</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:699-719</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="b">09</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">699-719</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400522 |