How do healthcare practitioners use incident data to improve patient safety in Japan? A qualitative study

Background Patient incident reporting systems have been widely used for ensuring safety and improving quality in care settings in many countries. However, little is known about the way in which incident data are used by frontline clinical staff. Furthermore, while the use of a systems perspective ha...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Background Patient incident reporting systems have been widely used for ensuring safety and improving quality in care settings in many countries. However, little is known about the way in which incident data are used by frontline clinical staff. Furthermore, while the use of a systems perspective has been reported as an effective way of learning from incident data in a multidisciplinary team, the level of adaptability of this perspective to a different cultural context has not been widely explored. The primary aim of the study, therefore, was to investigate how healthcare practitioners in Japan perceive the reporting systems and utilize a systems perspective in learning from incident data in acute care and mental health settings. Methods A non-experimental, descriptive and exploratory research design was adopted with the following two data-collection methods: 1) Sixty-one semi-structured interviews with frontline staff in two hospitals; and 2) Non-participatory observations of thirty-seven regular incident review meetings. The two hospitals in the Greater Tokyo area which were invited to take part were: 1) a not-for-profit, privately-run, acute care hospital with approximately 500 beds; and 2) a publicly-run mental health hospital with 200 beds. Results While the majority of staff acknowledge the positive impacts of the reporting systems on safety, the observation data found that little consideration was given to systems aspects during formal meetings. The meetings were primarily a place for the exchange of practical information, as opposed to in-depth discussions regarding causes of incidents and corrective measures. Learning from incident data was influenced by four factors: professional boundaries; dealing with a psychological burden; leadership and educational approach; and compatibility of patient safety with patient-centered care. Conclusions Healthcare organizations are highly complex, comprising of many professional boundaries and risk perceptions, and various communication styles. In order to establish an optimum method of individual and organizational learning and effective safety management, a fine balance has to be struck between respect for professional expertise in a local team and centralized safety oversight with a strong focus on systems. Further research needs to examine culturally-sensitive organizational and professional dynamics, including leader–follower relationships and the impact of resource constraints. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Autor*in:	Kodate, Naonori [verfasserIn] Taneda, Ken’ichiro Yumoto, Akiyo Kawakami, Nana

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Healthcare services Patient safety Risk management Health policy Acute care Mental health Organizational learning Safety culture Quality improvement Leadership

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2022

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: BMC health services research - London : BioMed Central, 2001, 22(2022), 1 vom: 22. Feb.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:22 ; year:2022 ; number:1 ; day:22 ; month:02

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s12913-022-07631-0

Katalog-ID:	SPR050509047