Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts

Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increa...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Lee, Jae-Eun [verfasserIn] Kwak, Yeong-Chan Jeong, Eui-Bong Jung, Hwa-Young Park, Sung-Woo Jo, Hyun-Wook

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	CFRP Dynamic response Resilient mount Naval shipboard structure

Anmerkung:	© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing - Sŏul : KSPE, 2009, 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:23 ; year:2022 ; number:3 ; day:08 ; month:02 ; pages:333-345

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7

Katalog-ID:	SPR050535331

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	SPR050535331
003	DE-627
005	20230507124433.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230507s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR050535331
035			\|a (SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Lee, Jae-Eun \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022
520			\|a Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%.
650		4	\|a CFRP \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Dynamic response \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Resilient mount \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Naval shipboard structure \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Kwak, Yeong-Chan \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Jeong, Eui-Bong \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Jung, Hwa-Young \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Park, Sung-Woo \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Jo, Hyun-Wook \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing \|d Sŏul : KSPE, 2009 \|g 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 \|w (DE-627)609403109 \|w (DE-600)2515436-9 \|x 2005-4602 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:23 \|g year:2022 \|g number:3 \|g day:08 \|g month:02 \|g pages:333-345
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_636
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2472
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2548
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4328
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 23 \|j 2022 \|e 3 \|b 08 \|c 02 \|h 333-345

Indexfelder

author_variant	j e l jel y c k yck e b j ebj h y j hyj s w p swp h w j hwj
matchkey_str	article:20054602:2022----::yairsosaayiadeiiainfhporsrcuesncmoie
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 doi (DE-627)SPR050535331 (SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Lee, Jae-Eun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889 aut Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022 Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. CFRP (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dynamic response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resilient mount (dpeaa)DE-He213 Naval shipboard structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kwak, Yeong-Chan aut Jeong, Eui-Bong aut Jung, Hwa-Young aut Park, Sung-Woo aut Jo, Hyun-Wook aut Enthalten in International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing Sŏul : KSPE, 2009 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 (DE-627)609403109 (DE-600)2515436-9 2005-4602 nnns volume:23 year:2022 number:3 day:08 month:02 pages:333-345 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2022 3 08 02 333-345
spelling	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 doi (DE-627)SPR050535331 (SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Lee, Jae-Eun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889 aut Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022 Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. CFRP (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dynamic response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resilient mount (dpeaa)DE-He213 Naval shipboard structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kwak, Yeong-Chan aut Jeong, Eui-Bong aut Jung, Hwa-Young aut Park, Sung-Woo aut Jo, Hyun-Wook aut Enthalten in International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing Sŏul : KSPE, 2009 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 (DE-627)609403109 (DE-600)2515436-9 2005-4602 nnns volume:23 year:2022 number:3 day:08 month:02 pages:333-345 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2022 3 08 02 333-345
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 doi (DE-627)SPR050535331 (SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Lee, Jae-Eun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889 aut Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022 Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. CFRP (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dynamic response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resilient mount (dpeaa)DE-He213 Naval shipboard structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kwak, Yeong-Chan aut Jeong, Eui-Bong aut Jung, Hwa-Young aut Park, Sung-Woo aut Jo, Hyun-Wook aut Enthalten in International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing Sŏul : KSPE, 2009 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 (DE-627)609403109 (DE-600)2515436-9 2005-4602 nnns volume:23 year:2022 number:3 day:08 month:02 pages:333-345 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2022 3 08 02 333-345
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 doi (DE-627)SPR050535331 (SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Lee, Jae-Eun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889 aut Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022 Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. CFRP (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dynamic response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resilient mount (dpeaa)DE-He213 Naval shipboard structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kwak, Yeong-Chan aut Jeong, Eui-Bong aut Jung, Hwa-Young aut Park, Sung-Woo aut Jo, Hyun-Wook aut Enthalten in International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing Sŏul : KSPE, 2009 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 (DE-627)609403109 (DE-600)2515436-9 2005-4602 nnns volume:23 year:2022 number:3 day:08 month:02 pages:333-345 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2022 3 08 02 333-345
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 doi (DE-627)SPR050535331 (SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Lee, Jae-Eun verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889 aut Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022 Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. CFRP (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dynamic response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resilient mount (dpeaa)DE-He213 Naval shipboard structure (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kwak, Yeong-Chan aut Jeong, Eui-Bong aut Jung, Hwa-Young aut Park, Sung-Woo aut Jo, Hyun-Wook aut Enthalten in International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing Sŏul : KSPE, 2009 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 (DE-627)609403109 (DE-600)2515436-9 2005-4602 nnns volume:23 year:2022 number:3 day:08 month:02 pages:333-345 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2022 3 08 02 333-345
language	English
source	Enthalten in International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 volume:23 year:2022 number:3 day:08 month:02 pages:333-345
sourceStr	Enthalten in International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing 23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345 volume:23 year:2022 number:3 day:08 month:02 pages:333-345
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	CFRP Dynamic response Resilient mount Naval shipboard structure
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Lee, Jae-Eun @@aut@@ Kwak, Yeong-Chan @@aut@@ Jeong, Eui-Bong @@aut@@ Jung, Hwa-Young @@aut@@ Park, Sung-Woo @@aut@@ Jo, Hyun-Wook @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-02-08T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	609403109
id	SPR050535331
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR050535331</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507124433.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230507s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR050535331</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Jae-Eun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFRP</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dynamic response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resilient mount</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Naval shipboard structure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kwak, Yeong-Chan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong, Eui-Bong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung, Hwa-Young</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Park, Sung-Woo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jo, Hyun-Wook</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing</subfield><subfield code="d">Sŏul : KSPE, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)609403109</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2515436-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2005-4602</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:333-345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">333-345</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Lee, Jae-Eun
spellingShingle	Lee, Jae-Eun misc CFRP misc Dynamic response misc Resilient mount misc Naval shipboard structure Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts
authorStr	Lee, Jae-Eun
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)609403109
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2005-4602
topic_title	Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts CFRP (dpeaa)DE-He213 Dynamic response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Resilient mount (dpeaa)DE-He213 Naval shipboard structure (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc CFRP misc Dynamic response misc Resilient mount misc Naval shipboard structure
topic_unstemmed	misc CFRP misc Dynamic response misc Resilient mount misc Naval shipboard structure
topic_browse	misc CFRP misc Dynamic response misc Resilient mount misc Naval shipboard structure
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing
hierarchy_parent_id	609403109
hierarchy_top_title	International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)609403109 (DE-600)2515436-9
title	Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR050535331 (SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e
title_full	Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts
author_sort	Lee, Jae-Eun
journal	International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing
journalStr	International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	333
author_browse	Lee, Jae-Eun Kwak, Yeong-Chan Jeong, Eui-Bong Jung, Hwa-Young Park, Sung-Woo Jo, Hyun-Wook
container_volume	23
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Lee, Jae-Eun
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0002-4164-1889
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889
title_sort	dynamic response analysis and verification of shipboard structure using composite materials and resilient mounts
title_auth	Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts
abstract	Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022
abstractGer	Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%. © Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7
remote_bool	true
author2	Kwak, Yeong-Chan Jeong, Eui-Bong Jung, Hwa-Young Park, Sung-Woo Jo, Hyun-Wook
author2Str	Kwak, Yeong-Chan Jeong, Eui-Bong Jung, Hwa-Young Park, Sung-Woo Jo, Hyun-Wook
ppnlink	609403109
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7
up_date	2024-07-03T16:09:41.347Z
_version_	1803574817697300480
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR050535331</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230507124433.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230507s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR050535331</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12541-022-00620-7-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Jae-Eun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-4164-1889</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Equipment testing and FEM analysis are common engineering problem solving methods used by engineers. However, in the problem-solving method by FEM analysis, the engineers should use an appropriate analysis solver, assume boundary conditions, and use the correct material properties to increase the reliability of finite element (FEM) analysis. In the case of solvers, the efforts of companies developing commercial analysis programs have greatly increased the reliability of the analysis solver, so engineers can achieve the reliability of the solver simply by selecting the correct solver for the engineering problem. However, the boundary conditions and material properties are usually based on the assumptions and experience of the engineer, but if the equipment becomes complex, uncertainty accumulates and the reliability of the analysis at the system level is greatly reduced. In particular, since there is no information when designing a product for the first time, it is difficult to expect the reliability of FEM modeling without applying an appropriate method. In the shipboard structure studied in this paper, it is difficult to predict the structural response at the system level due to the accumulation of uncertainty because the resilient mount, antenna pedestal, and radome are intricately connected and the isotropic material and anisotropic material are combined. In this paper, we applied a stepwise verification method to increase the reliability of FEM analysis of the shipboard structure. We performed experiments and FEM analysis on the shipboard structure using the method presented in this paper and found that the response of the natural frequency was consistent within about 1%. In addition, the acceleration response for all frequencies was consistent within 5%.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFRP</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dynamic response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Resilient mount</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Naval shipboard structure</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kwak, Yeong-Chan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong, Eui-Bong</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jung, Hwa-Young</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Park, Sung-Woo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jo, Hyun-Wook</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing</subfield><subfield code="d">Sŏul : KSPE, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2022), 3 vom: 08. Feb., Seite 333-345</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)609403109</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2515436-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2005-4602</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:08</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:333-345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12541-022-00620-7</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">08</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">333-345</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3995314

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Dynamic Response Analysis and Verification of Shipboard Structure Using Composite Materials and Resilient Mounts

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?