Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH

Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Gülci, Sercan [verfasserIn] Yurtseven, Huseyin Akay, Anil Orhan Akgul, Mustafa

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Precision forestry Individual tree measurement Vision technology Close-range detection Accuracy assessment

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Environmental monitoring and assessment - Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981, 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:195 ; year:2023 ; number:6 ; day:16 ; month:05

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8

Katalog-ID:	SPR051939436

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR051939436
003	DE-627
005	20230726104027.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230618s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR051939436
035			\|a (SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Gülci, Sercan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
520			\|a Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners.
650		4	\|a Precision forestry \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Individual tree measurement \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Vision technology \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Close-range detection \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Accuracy assessment \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Yurtseven, Huseyin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Akay, Anil Orhan \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Akgul, Mustafa \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Environmental monitoring and assessment \|d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981 \|g 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai \|w (DE-627)31281738X \|w (DE-600)2012242-1 \|x 1573-2959 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:195 \|g year:2023 \|g number:6 \|g day:16 \|g month:05
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_636
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2472
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2548
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4328
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 195 \|j 2023 \|e 6 \|b 16 \|c 05

Indexfelder

author_variant	s g sg h y hy a o a ao aoa m a ma
matchkey_str	article:15732959:2023----::esrntedaeeuigldrqipdmrpoecmaioosa
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 doi (DE-627)SPR051939436 (SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gülci, Sercan verfasserin aut Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. Precision forestry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Individual tree measurement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vision technology (dpeaa)DE-He213 Close-range detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yurtseven, Huseyin aut Akay, Anil Orhan aut Akgul, Mustafa aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai (DE-627)31281738X (DE-600)2012242-1 1573-2959 nnns volume:195 year:2023 number:6 day:16 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 195 2023 6 16 05
spelling	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 doi (DE-627)SPR051939436 (SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gülci, Sercan verfasserin aut Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. Precision forestry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Individual tree measurement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vision technology (dpeaa)DE-He213 Close-range detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yurtseven, Huseyin aut Akay, Anil Orhan aut Akgul, Mustafa aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai (DE-627)31281738X (DE-600)2012242-1 1573-2959 nnns volume:195 year:2023 number:6 day:16 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 195 2023 6 16 05
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 doi (DE-627)SPR051939436 (SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gülci, Sercan verfasserin aut Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. Precision forestry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Individual tree measurement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vision technology (dpeaa)DE-He213 Close-range detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yurtseven, Huseyin aut Akay, Anil Orhan aut Akgul, Mustafa aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai (DE-627)31281738X (DE-600)2012242-1 1573-2959 nnns volume:195 year:2023 number:6 day:16 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 195 2023 6 16 05
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 doi (DE-627)SPR051939436 (SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gülci, Sercan verfasserin aut Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. Precision forestry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Individual tree measurement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vision technology (dpeaa)DE-He213 Close-range detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yurtseven, Huseyin aut Akay, Anil Orhan aut Akgul, Mustafa aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai (DE-627)31281738X (DE-600)2012242-1 1573-2959 nnns volume:195 year:2023 number:6 day:16 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 195 2023 6 16 05
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 doi (DE-627)SPR051939436 (SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Gülci, Sercan verfasserin aut Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. Precision forestry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Individual tree measurement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vision technology (dpeaa)DE-He213 Close-range detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213 Yurtseven, Huseyin aut Akay, Anil Orhan aut Akgul, Mustafa aut Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai (DE-627)31281738X (DE-600)2012242-1 1573-2959 nnns volume:195 year:2023 number:6 day:16 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 195 2023 6 16 05
language	English
source	Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai volume:195 year:2023 number:6 day:16 month:05
sourceStr	Enthalten in Environmental monitoring and assessment 195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai volume:195 year:2023 number:6 day:16 month:05
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Precision forestry Individual tree measurement Vision technology Close-range detection Accuracy assessment
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Environmental monitoring and assessment
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Gülci, Sercan @@aut@@ Yurtseven, Huseyin @@aut@@ Akay, Anil Orhan @@aut@@ Akgul, Mustafa @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-05-16T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	31281738X
id	SPR051939436
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR051939436</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230726104027.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230618s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR051939436</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gülci, Sercan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Precision forestry</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Individual tree measurement</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Vision technology</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Close-range detection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accuracy assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yurtseven, Huseyin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akay, Anil Orhan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akgul, Mustafa</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental monitoring and assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981</subfield><subfield code="g">195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)31281738X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012242-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-2959</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:195</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">195</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Gülci, Sercan
spellingShingle	Gülci, Sercan misc Precision forestry misc Individual tree measurement misc Vision technology misc Close-range detection misc Accuracy assessment Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH
authorStr	Gülci, Sercan
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)31281738X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1573-2959
topic_title	Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH Precision forestry (dpeaa)DE-He213 Individual tree measurement (dpeaa)DE-He213 Vision technology (dpeaa)DE-He213 Close-range detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Accuracy assessment (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Precision forestry misc Individual tree measurement misc Vision technology misc Close-range detection misc Accuracy assessment
topic_unstemmed	misc Precision forestry misc Individual tree measurement misc Vision technology misc Close-range detection misc Accuracy assessment
topic_browse	misc Precision forestry misc Individual tree measurement misc Vision technology misc Close-range detection misc Accuracy assessment
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Environmental monitoring and assessment
hierarchy_parent_id	31281738X
hierarchy_top_title	Environmental monitoring and assessment
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)31281738X (DE-600)2012242-1
title	Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR051939436 (SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e
title_full	Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH
author_sort	Gülci, Sercan
journal	Environmental monitoring and assessment
journalStr	Environmental monitoring and assessment
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Gülci, Sercan Yurtseven, Huseyin Akay, Anil Orhan Akgul, Mustafa
container_volume	195
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Gülci, Sercan
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8
title_sort	measuring tree diameter using a lidar-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based dbh
title_auth	Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH
abstract	Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
abstractGer	Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	6
title_short	Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8
remote_bool	true
author2	Yurtseven, Huseyin Akay, Anil Orhan Akgul, Mustafa
author2Str	Yurtseven, Huseyin Akay, Anil Orhan Akgul, Mustafa
ppnlink	31281738X
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8
up_date	2024-07-04T00:31:40.712Z
_version_	1803606400136380416
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR051939436</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230726104027.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230618s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR051939436</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s10661-023-11366-8-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gülci, Sercan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Tree diameter measurement is one of the most important stages of forest inventories to assess growing stock, aboveground biomass, and landscape restoration options, among others. This study investigates the accuracy of measuring tree diameters using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)–equipped smartphone vs. a normal caliper (reference data) and the opportunity to use low-cost smartphone-based applications in forest inventories. To estimate the diameter at breast height (DBH) of single trees, we used a smartphone with a third-party app that automatically analyzed three-dimensional (3D) point clouds. For two different measurement techniques, we compared the two measurement techniques based on DBH data from 55 Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) and 50 oriental plane (Platanus orientalis L.) trees using the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), percent bias (PBIAS), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as precision and error statistics. Statistical differences were observed between the reference and smartphone-based DBH according to the paired-sample t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The R2 values obtained were determined as 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88 for Calabrian pine, oriental plane, and all tree species (105 trees), respectively. In addition to the overall accuracy performance of the comparison between reference and estimations, MAE, MSE, RMSE, and PBIAS values for the DBH of 105 tree stems were calculated as 1.56 cm, 5.42 cm, 2.33 cm, and − 5.10%, respectively. The estimation accuracies increased in regular stem forms compared with forked stems particularly observed on plane trees. Further experiments are needed to investigate the uncertainties associated with trees of different stem forms, species (coniferous or deciduous), different work environments, and different types of LiDAR and LiDAR-based app scanners.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Precision forestry</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Individual tree measurement</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Vision technology</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Close-range detection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Accuracy assessment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yurtseven, Huseyin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akay, Anil Orhan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Akgul, Mustafa</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Environmental monitoring and assessment</subfield><subfield code="d">Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1981</subfield><subfield code="g">195(2023), 6 vom: 16. Mai</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)31281738X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012242-1</subfield><subfield code="x">1573-2959</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:195</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11366-8</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">195</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3995314

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?