Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries

Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Addo, Isaac Y. [verfasserIn] Acquah, Evelyn Ayebeng, Castro Dickson, Kwamena S.

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Breast cancer Malignancy Breast screening Breast check Breast screen Socio-demographic characteristics

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2023

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: BMC public health - London : BioMed Central, 2001, 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:23 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; day:19 ; month:05

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w

Katalog-ID:	SPR052504700

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	SPR052504700
003	DE-627
005	20230726104843.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230726s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR052504700
035			\|a (SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Addo, Isaac Y. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2023
520			\|a Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits.
650		4	\|a Breast cancer \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Malignancy \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Breast screening \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Breast check \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Breast screen \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Socio-demographic characteristics \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Acquah, Evelyn \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Ayebeng, Castro \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Dickson, Kwamena S. \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t BMC public health \|d London : BioMed Central, 2001 \|g 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai \|w (DE-627)326643583 \|w (DE-600)2041338-5 \|x 1471-2458 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:23 \|g year:2023 \|g number:1 \|g day:19 \|g month:05
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 23 \|j 2023 \|e 1 \|b 19 \|c 05

Indexfelder

author_variant	i y a iy iya e a ea c a ca k s d ks ksd
matchkey_str	article:14712458:2023----::nlecodsacthatfclteociiabescnesreigeaiuaogoe
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w doi (DE-627)SPR052504700 (SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Addo, Isaac Y. verfasserin aut Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. Breast cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Malignancy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screening (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast check (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Socio-demographic characteristics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquah, Evelyn aut Ayebeng, Castro aut Dickson, Kwamena S. aut Enthalten in BMC public health London : BioMed Central, 2001 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai (DE-627)326643583 (DE-600)2041338-5 1471-2458 nnns volume:23 year:2023 number:1 day:19 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2023 1 19 05
spelling	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w doi (DE-627)SPR052504700 (SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Addo, Isaac Y. verfasserin aut Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. Breast cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Malignancy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screening (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast check (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Socio-demographic characteristics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquah, Evelyn aut Ayebeng, Castro aut Dickson, Kwamena S. aut Enthalten in BMC public health London : BioMed Central, 2001 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai (DE-627)326643583 (DE-600)2041338-5 1471-2458 nnns volume:23 year:2023 number:1 day:19 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2023 1 19 05
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w doi (DE-627)SPR052504700 (SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Addo, Isaac Y. verfasserin aut Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. Breast cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Malignancy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screening (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast check (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Socio-demographic characteristics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquah, Evelyn aut Ayebeng, Castro aut Dickson, Kwamena S. aut Enthalten in BMC public health London : BioMed Central, 2001 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai (DE-627)326643583 (DE-600)2041338-5 1471-2458 nnns volume:23 year:2023 number:1 day:19 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2023 1 19 05
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w doi (DE-627)SPR052504700 (SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Addo, Isaac Y. verfasserin aut Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. Breast cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Malignancy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screening (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast check (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Socio-demographic characteristics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquah, Evelyn aut Ayebeng, Castro aut Dickson, Kwamena S. aut Enthalten in BMC public health London : BioMed Central, 2001 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai (DE-627)326643583 (DE-600)2041338-5 1471-2458 nnns volume:23 year:2023 number:1 day:19 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2023 1 19 05
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w doi (DE-627)SPR052504700 (SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Addo, Isaac Y. verfasserin aut Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. Breast cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Malignancy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screening (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast check (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Socio-demographic characteristics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Acquah, Evelyn aut Ayebeng, Castro aut Dickson, Kwamena S. aut Enthalten in BMC public health London : BioMed Central, 2001 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai (DE-627)326643583 (DE-600)2041338-5 1471-2458 nnns volume:23 year:2023 number:1 day:19 month:05 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2023 1 19 05
language	English
source	Enthalten in BMC public health 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai volume:23 year:2023 number:1 day:19 month:05
sourceStr	Enthalten in BMC public health 23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai volume:23 year:2023 number:1 day:19 month:05
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Breast cancer Malignancy Breast screening Breast check Breast screen Socio-demographic characteristics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	BMC public health
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Addo, Isaac Y. @@aut@@ Acquah, Evelyn @@aut@@ Ayebeng, Castro @@aut@@ Dickson, Kwamena S. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-05-19T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	326643583
id	SPR052504700
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR052504700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230726104843.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230726s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR052504700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Addo, Isaac Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Malignancy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast screening</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast check</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast screen</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Socio-demographic characteristics</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acquah, Evelyn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ayebeng, Castro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dickson, Kwamena S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC public health</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)326643583</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2041338-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1471-2458</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Addo, Isaac Y.
spellingShingle	Addo, Isaac Y. misc Breast cancer misc Malignancy misc Breast screening misc Breast check misc Breast screen misc Socio-demographic characteristics Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries
authorStr	Addo, Isaac Y.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)326643583
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1471-2458
topic_title	Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries Breast cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Malignancy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screening (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast check (dpeaa)DE-He213 Breast screen (dpeaa)DE-He213 Socio-demographic characteristics (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Breast cancer misc Malignancy misc Breast screening misc Breast check misc Breast screen misc Socio-demographic characteristics
topic_unstemmed	misc Breast cancer misc Malignancy misc Breast screening misc Breast check misc Breast screen misc Socio-demographic characteristics
topic_browse	misc Breast cancer misc Malignancy misc Breast screening misc Breast check misc Breast screen misc Socio-demographic characteristics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	BMC public health
hierarchy_parent_id	326643583
hierarchy_top_title	BMC public health
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)326643583 (DE-600)2041338-5
title	Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR052504700 (SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e
title_full	Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries
author_sort	Addo, Isaac Y.
journal	BMC public health
journalStr	BMC public health
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Addo, Isaac Y. Acquah, Evelyn Ayebeng, Castro Dickson, Kwamena S.
container_volume	23
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Addo, Isaac Y.
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w
title_sort	influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-saharan african countries
title_auth	Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries
abstract	Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. © The Author(s) 2023
abstractGer	Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. © The Author(s) 2023
abstract_unstemmed	Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits. © The Author(s) 2023
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w
remote_bool	true
author2	Acquah, Evelyn Ayebeng, Castro Dickson, Kwamena S.
author2Str	Acquah, Evelyn Ayebeng, Castro Dickson, Kwamena S.
ppnlink	326643583
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w
up_date	2024-07-04T03:01:38.259Z
_version_	1803615834750320640
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR052504700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230726104843.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230726s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR052504700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12889-023-15782-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Addo, Isaac Y.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Regular breast screening is one of the most effective ways to detect early signs of breast cancer but travel distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities can affect breast screening attendance. Yet, limited studies have examined the impact of distance to cancer-diagnostic facilities on clinical breast screening behaviour among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined the influence of travel distance to a health facility on clinical breast screening behaviour in five SSA countries: Namibia, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Kenya, and Lesotho. The study further assessed variations in clinical breast screening behaviour across diverse socio-demographic characteristics of women. Methods A sample of 45,945 women was drawn from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for the included countries. The DHS uses 2-stage stratified cluster sampling to select nationally representative samples of women (15–49) and men (15–64) via a cross-sectional design. Proportions and binary logistic regression were used to examine associations between the women’s socio-demographic characteristics and breast screening attendance. Results The overall proportion of survey participants who underwent clinical breast cancer screening was 16.3%. Travel distance to a health facility had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on clinical breast screening behaviour as 18.5% of participants who self-reported distance as “not a big problem” attended clinical breast screening compared to 10.8% who self-reported distance as “a big problem”. The study further found that various socio-demographic factors were significantly associated with breast cancer screening uptake, including age, education level, media exposure, wealth status, parity, contraceptive use, health insurance coverage, and marital status. The multivariate analysis controlling for other factors confirmed the strong association between distance to health facilities and screening uptake. Conclusions The study found that travel distance is a significant factor affecting clinical breast screening attendance among women in the selected SSA countries. Furthermore, the likelihood of breast screening attendance varied depending on different women’s characteristics. It is crucial to prioritise breast screening interventions, particularly among the disadvantaged women identified in this study, to achieve maximum public health benefits.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Malignancy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast screening</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast check</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Breast screen</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Socio-demographic characteristics</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acquah, Evelyn</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ayebeng, Castro</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dickson, Kwamena S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC public health</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2023), 1 vom: 19. Mai</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)326643583</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2041338-5</subfield><subfield code="x">1471-2458</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15782-w</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4019346

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Influence of distance to health facilities on clinical breast cancer screening behaviour among women in five sub-Saharan African countries

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?