The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer
Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lym...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Xie, Shangdan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2023 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology - Berlin : Springer, 1904, 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:149 ; year:2023 ; number:12 ; day:26 ; month:05 ; pages:9671-9677 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR052727521 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR052727521 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230813064635.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230813s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR052727521 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Xie, Shangdan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s) 2023 | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Cervical cancer |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pelvic lymph nodal |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metastases |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Distribution |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhao, Jing |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Xintao |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hu, Yan |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Feng, Guannan |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Haiyan |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chao |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |d Berlin : Springer, 1904 |g 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 |w (DE-627)253769515 |w (DE-600)1459285-X |x 1432-1335 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:149 |g year:2023 |g number:12 |g day:26 |g month:05 |g pages:9671-9677 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_165 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_267 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_711 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 149 |j 2023 |e 12 |b 26 |c 05 |h 9671-9677 | ||
| author_variant |
s x sx j z jz x w xw y h yh g f gf h z hz c w cw |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:14321335:2023----::hdsrbtoptenfevcypndleats |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 doi (DE-627)SPR052727521 (SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xie, Shangdan verfasserin aut The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. Cervical cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic lymph nodal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Metastases (dpeaa)DE-He213 Distribution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhao, Jing aut Wang, Xintao aut Hu, Yan aut Feng, Guannan aut Zhu, Haiyan aut Wang, Chao aut Enthalten in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Berlin : Springer, 1904 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 (DE-627)253769515 (DE-600)1459285-X 1432-1335 nnns volume:149 year:2023 number:12 day:26 month:05 pages:9671-9677 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 149 2023 12 26 05 9671-9677 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 doi (DE-627)SPR052727521 (SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xie, Shangdan verfasserin aut The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. Cervical cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic lymph nodal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Metastases (dpeaa)DE-He213 Distribution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhao, Jing aut Wang, Xintao aut Hu, Yan aut Feng, Guannan aut Zhu, Haiyan aut Wang, Chao aut Enthalten in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Berlin : Springer, 1904 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 (DE-627)253769515 (DE-600)1459285-X 1432-1335 nnns volume:149 year:2023 number:12 day:26 month:05 pages:9671-9677 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 149 2023 12 26 05 9671-9677 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 doi (DE-627)SPR052727521 (SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xie, Shangdan verfasserin aut The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. Cervical cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic lymph nodal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Metastases (dpeaa)DE-He213 Distribution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhao, Jing aut Wang, Xintao aut Hu, Yan aut Feng, Guannan aut Zhu, Haiyan aut Wang, Chao aut Enthalten in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Berlin : Springer, 1904 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 (DE-627)253769515 (DE-600)1459285-X 1432-1335 nnns volume:149 year:2023 number:12 day:26 month:05 pages:9671-9677 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 149 2023 12 26 05 9671-9677 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 doi (DE-627)SPR052727521 (SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xie, Shangdan verfasserin aut The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. Cervical cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic lymph nodal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Metastases (dpeaa)DE-He213 Distribution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhao, Jing aut Wang, Xintao aut Hu, Yan aut Feng, Guannan aut Zhu, Haiyan aut Wang, Chao aut Enthalten in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Berlin : Springer, 1904 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 (DE-627)253769515 (DE-600)1459285-X 1432-1335 nnns volume:149 year:2023 number:12 day:26 month:05 pages:9671-9677 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 149 2023 12 26 05 9671-9677 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 doi (DE-627)SPR052727521 (SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Xie, Shangdan verfasserin aut The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. Cervical cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic lymph nodal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Metastases (dpeaa)DE-He213 Distribution (dpeaa)DE-He213 Zhao, Jing aut Wang, Xintao aut Hu, Yan aut Feng, Guannan aut Zhu, Haiyan aut Wang, Chao aut Enthalten in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology Berlin : Springer, 1904 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 (DE-627)253769515 (DE-600)1459285-X 1432-1335 nnns volume:149 year:2023 number:12 day:26 month:05 pages:9671-9677 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 149 2023 12 26 05 9671-9677 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 volume:149 year:2023 number:12 day:26 month:05 pages:9671-9677 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677 volume:149 year:2023 number:12 day:26 month:05 pages:9671-9677 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Cervical cancer Pelvic lymph nodal Metastases Distribution |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Xie, Shangdan @@aut@@ Zhao, Jing @@aut@@ Wang, Xintao @@aut@@ Hu, Yan @@aut@@ Feng, Guannan @@aut@@ Zhu, Haiyan @@aut@@ Wang, Chao @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-05-26T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
253769515 |
| id |
SPR052727521 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR052727521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230813064635.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230813s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR052727521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xie, Shangdan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cervical cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic lymph nodal</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metastases</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Distribution</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Jing</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Xintao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Yan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Guannan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Haiyan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1904</subfield><subfield code="g">149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)253769515</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1459285-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-1335</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:149</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">day:26</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9671-9677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">149</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="b">26</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">9671-9677</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Xie, Shangdan |
| spellingShingle |
Xie, Shangdan misc Cervical cancer misc Pelvic lymph nodal misc Metastases misc Distribution The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer |
| authorStr |
Xie, Shangdan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)253769515 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1432-1335 |
| topic_title |
The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer Cervical cancer (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pelvic lymph nodal (dpeaa)DE-He213 Metastases (dpeaa)DE-He213 Distribution (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Cervical cancer misc Pelvic lymph nodal misc Metastases misc Distribution |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Cervical cancer misc Pelvic lymph nodal misc Metastases misc Distribution |
| topic_browse |
misc Cervical cancer misc Pelvic lymph nodal misc Metastases misc Distribution |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
253769515 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)253769515 (DE-600)1459285-X |
| title |
The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR052727521 (SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e |
| title_full |
The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer |
| author_sort |
Xie, Shangdan |
| journal |
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
| journalStr |
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2023 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
9671 |
| author_browse |
Xie, Shangdan Zhao, Jing Wang, Xintao Hu, Yan Feng, Guannan Zhu, Haiyan Wang, Chao |
| container_volume |
149 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Xie, Shangdan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 |
| title_sort |
distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer |
| title_auth |
The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer |
| abstract |
Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. © The Author(s) 2023 |
| abstractGer |
Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. © The Author(s) 2023 |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened. © The Author(s) 2023 |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_267 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_711 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
12 |
| title_short |
The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Zhao, Jing Wang, Xintao Hu, Yan Feng, Guannan Zhu, Haiyan Wang, Chao |
| author2Str |
Zhao, Jing Wang, Xintao Hu, Yan Feng, Guannan Zhu, Haiyan Wang, Chao |
| ppnlink |
253769515 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:21:19.243Z |
| _version_ |
1803567999744999424 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR052727521</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230813064635.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230813s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR052727521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s00432-023-04810-2-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xie, Shangdan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose Depiction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) sites among patients with cervical cancer facilitates accurate determination of the extent of dissection and radiotherapy regimens. Methods A retrospective study of 1182 cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2008 and 2018 was performed. The number of removed pelvic lymph nodes and metastasis status in different anatomical regions was analyzed. The prognostic difference of patients with lymph node involvement stratified by various factors was analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. Results The median number of pelvic lymph nodes detected was 22, mainly from obturator (29.54%) and inguinal (21.14%) sites. Metastatic pelvic lymph nodes were found in 192 patients, with obturator accounting for the highest percentage (42.86%). The patients with lymph node involvement in single site had better prognosis that those in multiple sites. The overall- (P = 0.021) (OS) and progression-free (P < 0.001) survival (PFS) curves of patients with inguinal lymph node metastases were worse compared to those with obturator site. There was no difference in the OS and PFS among patients with 2 and more than 2 lymph nodes involvement. Conclusion An explicit map of LNM in patients with cervical cancer was presented in this study. Obturator lymph nodes tended to be involved. The prognosis of patients with inguinal lymph node involvement was poor in contrast to that with obturator LNM. In patients with inguinal lymph node metastases, clinical staging needs to be reconsidered and extended radiotherapy to the inguinal region needs to be strengthened.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cervical cancer</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pelvic lymph nodal</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metastases</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Distribution</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao, Jing</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Xintao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Yan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Guannan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Haiyan</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chao</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 1904</subfield><subfield code="g">149(2023), 12 vom: 26. Mai, Seite 9671-9677</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)253769515</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1459285-X</subfield><subfield code="x">1432-1335</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:149</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12</subfield><subfield code="g">day:26</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9671-9677</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_267</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_711</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">149</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">12</subfield><subfield code="b">26</subfield><subfield code="c">05</subfield><subfield code="h">9671-9677</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401394 |