Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection
Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this l...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Zabin, Mahe [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2023 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of Big Data - Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014, 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:10 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; day:26 ; month:09 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR053213017 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR053213017 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231120064814.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231002s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR053213017 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Zabin, Mahe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2023 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Metal surface defects |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Lightweight convolutional encoder |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Semi-supervised learning |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Self-supervised learning |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Choi, Ho-Jin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Uddin, Jia |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Big Data |d Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014 |g 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. |w (DE-627)79213219X |w (DE-600)2780218-8 |x 2196-1115 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:26 |g month:09 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 10 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 26 |c 09 |
author_variant |
m z mz a n b k anb anbk m k k mk mkk h j c hjc j u ju |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:21961115:2023----::otatvslsprierpeettolannfaeokomt |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z doi (DE-627)SPR053213017 (SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Zabin, Mahe verfasserin aut Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. Metal surface defects (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lightweight convolutional encoder (dpeaa)DE-He213 Semi-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte aut Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb aut Choi, Ho-Jin aut Uddin, Jia aut Enthalten in Journal of Big Data Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. (DE-627)79213219X (DE-600)2780218-8 2196-1115 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1 day:26 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1 26 09 |
spelling |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z doi (DE-627)SPR053213017 (SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Zabin, Mahe verfasserin aut Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. Metal surface defects (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lightweight convolutional encoder (dpeaa)DE-He213 Semi-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte aut Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb aut Choi, Ho-Jin aut Uddin, Jia aut Enthalten in Journal of Big Data Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. (DE-627)79213219X (DE-600)2780218-8 2196-1115 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1 day:26 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1 26 09 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z doi (DE-627)SPR053213017 (SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Zabin, Mahe verfasserin aut Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. Metal surface defects (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lightweight convolutional encoder (dpeaa)DE-He213 Semi-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte aut Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb aut Choi, Ho-Jin aut Uddin, Jia aut Enthalten in Journal of Big Data Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. (DE-627)79213219X (DE-600)2780218-8 2196-1115 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1 day:26 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1 26 09 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z doi (DE-627)SPR053213017 (SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Zabin, Mahe verfasserin aut Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. Metal surface defects (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lightweight convolutional encoder (dpeaa)DE-He213 Semi-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte aut Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb aut Choi, Ho-Jin aut Uddin, Jia aut Enthalten in Journal of Big Data Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. (DE-627)79213219X (DE-600)2780218-8 2196-1115 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1 day:26 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1 26 09 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z doi (DE-627)SPR053213017 (SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Zabin, Mahe verfasserin aut Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. Metal surface defects (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lightweight convolutional encoder (dpeaa)DE-He213 Semi-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte aut Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb aut Choi, Ho-Jin aut Uddin, Jia aut Enthalten in Journal of Big Data Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. (DE-627)79213219X (DE-600)2780218-8 2196-1115 nnns volume:10 year:2023 number:1 day:26 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 10 2023 1 26 09 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of Big Data 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. volume:10 year:2023 number:1 day:26 month:09 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of Big Data 10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept. volume:10 year:2023 number:1 day:26 month:09 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Metal surface defects Lightweight convolutional encoder Semi-supervised learning Self-supervised learning |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of Big Data |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zabin, Mahe @@aut@@ Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte @@aut@@ Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb @@aut@@ Choi, Ho-Jin @@aut@@ Uddin, Jia @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-09-26T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
79213219X |
id |
SPR053213017 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053213017</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231120064814.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231002s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053213017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zabin, Mahe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metal surface defects</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lightweight convolutional encoder</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semi-supervised learning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-supervised learning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Ho-Jin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uddin, Jia</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Big Data</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)79213219X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2780218-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2196-1115</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:26</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">26</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Zabin, Mahe |
spellingShingle |
Zabin, Mahe misc Metal surface defects misc Lightweight convolutional encoder misc Semi-supervised learning misc Self-supervised learning Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection |
authorStr |
Zabin, Mahe |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)79213219X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2196-1115 |
topic_title |
Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection Metal surface defects (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lightweight convolutional encoder (dpeaa)DE-He213 Semi-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 Self-supervised learning (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Metal surface defects misc Lightweight convolutional encoder misc Semi-supervised learning misc Self-supervised learning |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Metal surface defects misc Lightweight convolutional encoder misc Semi-supervised learning misc Self-supervised learning |
topic_browse |
misc Metal surface defects misc Lightweight convolutional encoder misc Semi-supervised learning misc Self-supervised learning |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Big Data |
hierarchy_parent_id |
79213219X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Big Data |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)79213219X (DE-600)2780218-8 |
title |
Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR053213017 (SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e |
title_full |
Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection |
author_sort |
Zabin, Mahe |
journal |
Journal of Big Data |
journalStr |
Journal of Big Data |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Zabin, Mahe Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb Choi, Ho-Jin Uddin, Jia |
container_volume |
10 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Zabin, Mahe |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z |
title_sort |
contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection |
title_auth |
Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection |
abstract |
Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. © The Author(s) 2023 |
abstractGer |
Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. © The Author(s) 2023 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs. © The Author(s) 2023 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb Choi, Ho-Jin Uddin, Jia |
author2Str |
Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb Choi, Ho-Jin Uddin, Jia |
ppnlink |
79213219X |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z |
up_date |
2024-07-03T17:53:12.030Z |
_version_ |
1803581330071486464 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053213017</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231120064814.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231002s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053213017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40537-023-00827-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zabin, Mahe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contrastive self-supervised representation learning framework for metal surface defect detection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Automated detection of defects on metal surfaces is crucial for ensuring quality control. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets for emerging target defects poses a significant obstacle. This study proposes a self-supervised representation-learning model that effectively addresses this limitation by leveraging both labeled and unlabeled data. The proposed model was developed based on a contrastive learning framework, supported by an augmentation pipeline and a lightweight convolutional encoder. The effectiveness of the proposed approach for representation learning was evaluated using an unlabeled pretraining dataset created from three benchmark datasets. Furthermore, the performance of the proposed model was validated using the NEU metal surface-defect dataset. The results revealed that the proposed method achieved a classification accuracy of 97.78%, even with fewer trainable parameters than the benchmark models. Overall, the proposed model effectively extracted meaningful representations from unlabeled image data and can be employed in downstream tasks for steel defect classification to improve quality control and reduce inspection costs.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Metal surface defects</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lightweight convolutional encoder</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semi-supervised learning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-supervised learning</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kabir, Anika Nahian Binte</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kabir, Muhammad Khubayeeb</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Ho-Jin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Uddin, Jia</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Big Data</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : SpringerOpen, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2023), 1 vom: 26. Sept.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)79213219X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2780218-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2196-1115</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:26</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00827-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">26</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.401 |