Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students

Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objecti...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro [verfasserIn] Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto Hernández-Martínez, Antonio

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Simulation Undergraduate nursing Nursing education research Evaluation

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2023

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: BMC nursing - London : BioMed Central, 2002, 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:22 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; day:28 ; month:09

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2

Katalog-ID:	SPR053239083

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	SPR053239083
003	DE-627
005	20231119064828.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	231002s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR053239083
035			\|a (SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Martínez-Arce, Alejandro \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2023
520			\|a Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience.
650		4	\|a Simulation \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Undergraduate nursing \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Nursing education research \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Evaluation \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Hernández-Martínez, Antonio \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t BMC nursing \|d London : BioMed Central, 2002 \|g 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. \|w (DE-627)355492318 \|w (DE-600)2091496-9 \|x 1472-6955 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:22 \|g year:2023 \|g number:1 \|g day:28 \|g month:09
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 22 \|j 2023 \|e 1 \|b 28 \|c 09

Indexfelder

author_variant	a m a ama j r a jra e v v evv p r g prg a t r atr a h m ahm
matchkey_str	article:14726955:2023----::aiainfsotesooteihieiyiuainaifci
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 doi (DE-627)SPR053239083 (SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Martínez-Arce, Alejandro verfasserin aut Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. Simulation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Undergraduate nursing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nursing education research (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián aut Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza aut Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma aut Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto aut Hernández-Martínez, Antonio aut Enthalten in BMC nursing London : BioMed Central, 2002 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. (DE-627)355492318 (DE-600)2091496-9 1472-6955 nnns volume:22 year:2023 number:1 day:28 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 22 2023 1 28 09
spelling	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 doi (DE-627)SPR053239083 (SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Martínez-Arce, Alejandro verfasserin aut Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. Simulation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Undergraduate nursing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nursing education research (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián aut Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza aut Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma aut Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto aut Hernández-Martínez, Antonio aut Enthalten in BMC nursing London : BioMed Central, 2002 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. (DE-627)355492318 (DE-600)2091496-9 1472-6955 nnns volume:22 year:2023 number:1 day:28 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 22 2023 1 28 09
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 doi (DE-627)SPR053239083 (SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Martínez-Arce, Alejandro verfasserin aut Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. Simulation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Undergraduate nursing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nursing education research (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián aut Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza aut Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma aut Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto aut Hernández-Martínez, Antonio aut Enthalten in BMC nursing London : BioMed Central, 2002 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. (DE-627)355492318 (DE-600)2091496-9 1472-6955 nnns volume:22 year:2023 number:1 day:28 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 22 2023 1 28 09
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 doi (DE-627)SPR053239083 (SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Martínez-Arce, Alejandro verfasserin aut Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. Simulation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Undergraduate nursing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nursing education research (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián aut Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza aut Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma aut Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto aut Hernández-Martínez, Antonio aut Enthalten in BMC nursing London : BioMed Central, 2002 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. (DE-627)355492318 (DE-600)2091496-9 1472-6955 nnns volume:22 year:2023 number:1 day:28 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 22 2023 1 28 09
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 doi (DE-627)SPR053239083 (SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Martínez-Arce, Alejandro verfasserin aut Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. Simulation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Undergraduate nursing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nursing education research (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián aut Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza aut Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma aut Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto aut Hernández-Martínez, Antonio aut Enthalten in BMC nursing London : BioMed Central, 2002 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. (DE-627)355492318 (DE-600)2091496-9 1472-6955 nnns volume:22 year:2023 number:1 day:28 month:09 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 22 2023 1 28 09
language	English
source	Enthalten in BMC nursing 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. volume:22 year:2023 number:1 day:28 month:09
sourceStr	Enthalten in BMC nursing 22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept. volume:22 year:2023 number:1 day:28 month:09
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Simulation Undergraduate nursing Nursing education research Evaluation
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	BMC nursing
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro @@aut@@ Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián @@aut@@ Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza @@aut@@ Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma @@aut@@ Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto @@aut@@ Hernández-Martínez, Antonio @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-09-28T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	355492318
id	SPR053239083
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053239083</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231119064828.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231002s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053239083</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martínez-Arce, Alejandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Simulation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Undergraduate nursing</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nursing education research</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hernández-Martínez, Antonio</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC nursing</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)355492318</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2091496-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1472-6955</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro
spellingShingle	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro misc Simulation misc Undergraduate nursing misc Nursing education research misc Evaluation Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students
authorStr	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)355492318
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1472-6955
topic_title	Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students Simulation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Undergraduate nursing (dpeaa)DE-He213 Nursing education research (dpeaa)DE-He213 Evaluation (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc Simulation misc Undergraduate nursing misc Nursing education research misc Evaluation
topic_unstemmed	misc Simulation misc Undergraduate nursing misc Nursing education research misc Evaluation
topic_browse	misc Simulation misc Undergraduate nursing misc Nursing education research misc Evaluation
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	BMC nursing
hierarchy_parent_id	355492318
hierarchy_top_title	BMC nursing
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)355492318 (DE-600)2091496-9
title	Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR053239083 (SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e
title_full	Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students
author_sort	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro
journal	BMC nursing
journalStr	BMC nursing
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto Hernández-Martínez, Antonio
container_volume	22
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Martínez-Arce, Alejandro
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2
title_sort	validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students
title_auth	Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students
abstract	Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. © The Author(s) 2023
abstractGer	Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. © The Author(s) 2023
abstract_unstemmed	Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience. © The Author(s) 2023
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2
remote_bool	true
author2	Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto Hernández-Martínez, Antonio
author2Str	Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto Hernández-Martínez, Antonio
ppnlink	355492318
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2
up_date	2024-07-03T18:04:29.307Z
_version_	1803582040242651136
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053239083</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231119064828.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231002s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053239083</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12912-023-01515-2-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martínez-Arce, Alejandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Clinical simulation provides a practical and effective learning method during the undergraduate education of health professions. Currently there is only one validated scale in Spanish to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with the use of high-fidelity simulation, therefore, our objective is to validate a brief version of this scale in undergraduate nursing students with or without clinical experience. Method A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed. Between 2018 and 2020, the students from all academic courses of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz nursing school completed the satisfaction scale at the end of their simulation experiences. To validate this scale, composed of 33 items and eight dimensions, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the principal components was performed, the internal consistency was studied using Cronbach’s alpha, and the corrected item-test correlation of each of the items of the total scale was reviewed. Results 425 students completed the scale, after the exploratory factor analysis, a scale consisting of 25 items distributed into six subscales, each containing between two and six items, explained a variance of 66.5%. The KMO test (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) obtained a value of 0.938, Bartlett’s sphericity test was < 0.01 and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.991. Conclusion The modified ESSAF scale, reduced from 33 to 25 items and divided into six subscales, is as valid and reliable as the original scale for use in nursing students of different levels, with, or without clinical experience.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Simulation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Undergraduate nursing</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nursing education research</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rodríguez-Almagro, Julián</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vélez-Vélez, Esperanza</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rodríguez-Gómez, Paloma</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tovar-Reinoso, Alberto</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hernández-Martínez, Antonio</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC nursing</subfield><subfield code="d">London : BioMed Central, 2002</subfield><subfield code="g">22(2023), 1 vom: 28. Sept.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)355492318</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2091496-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1472-6955</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:22</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:28</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01515-2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">22</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">28</subfield><subfield code="c">09</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.402011

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Validation of a short version of the high-fidelity simulation satisfaction scale in nursing students

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?