A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results
Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Madhira, Madhav [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Indian geotechnical journal - New York, NY : Springer, 2012, 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:53 ; year:2023 ; number:6 ; day:06 ; month:07 ; pages:1505-1516 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR053700163 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR053700163 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231111064654.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231111s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR053700163 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Madhira, Madhav |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 | ||
520 | |a Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Pile capacity |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Cyclic pile load test |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Settlements |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Shaft and base capacities |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Kota, Vijay Kiran |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Indian geotechnical journal |d New York, NY : Springer, 2012 |g 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 |w (DE-627)739212354 |w (DE-600)2707502-3 |x 2277-3347 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2023 |g number:6 |g day:06 |g month:07 |g pages:1505-1516 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2018 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 53 |j 2023 |e 6 |b 06 |c 07 |h 1505-1516 |
author_variant |
m m mm v k k vk vkk |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:22773347:2023----::nvlehdordcsatnbsrsossfplfocc |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 doi (DE-627)SPR053700163 (SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Madhira, Madhav verfasserin aut A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. Pile capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cyclic pile load test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Settlements (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shaft and base capacities (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kota, Vijay Kiran aut Enthalten in Indian geotechnical journal New York, NY : Springer, 2012 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 (DE-627)739212354 (DE-600)2707502-3 2277-3347 nnns volume:53 year:2023 number:6 day:06 month:07 pages:1505-1516 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 53 2023 6 06 07 1505-1516 |
spelling |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 doi (DE-627)SPR053700163 (SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Madhira, Madhav verfasserin aut A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. Pile capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cyclic pile load test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Settlements (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shaft and base capacities (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kota, Vijay Kiran aut Enthalten in Indian geotechnical journal New York, NY : Springer, 2012 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 (DE-627)739212354 (DE-600)2707502-3 2277-3347 nnns volume:53 year:2023 number:6 day:06 month:07 pages:1505-1516 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 53 2023 6 06 07 1505-1516 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 doi (DE-627)SPR053700163 (SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Madhira, Madhav verfasserin aut A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. Pile capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cyclic pile load test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Settlements (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shaft and base capacities (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kota, Vijay Kiran aut Enthalten in Indian geotechnical journal New York, NY : Springer, 2012 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 (DE-627)739212354 (DE-600)2707502-3 2277-3347 nnns volume:53 year:2023 number:6 day:06 month:07 pages:1505-1516 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 53 2023 6 06 07 1505-1516 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 doi (DE-627)SPR053700163 (SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Madhira, Madhav verfasserin aut A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. Pile capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cyclic pile load test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Settlements (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shaft and base capacities (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kota, Vijay Kiran aut Enthalten in Indian geotechnical journal New York, NY : Springer, 2012 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 (DE-627)739212354 (DE-600)2707502-3 2277-3347 nnns volume:53 year:2023 number:6 day:06 month:07 pages:1505-1516 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 53 2023 6 06 07 1505-1516 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 doi (DE-627)SPR053700163 (SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Madhira, Madhav verfasserin aut A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. Pile capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cyclic pile load test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Settlements (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shaft and base capacities (dpeaa)DE-He213 Kota, Vijay Kiran aut Enthalten in Indian geotechnical journal New York, NY : Springer, 2012 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 (DE-627)739212354 (DE-600)2707502-3 2277-3347 nnns volume:53 year:2023 number:6 day:06 month:07 pages:1505-1516 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 53 2023 6 06 07 1505-1516 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Indian geotechnical journal 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 volume:53 year:2023 number:6 day:06 month:07 pages:1505-1516 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Indian geotechnical journal 53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516 volume:53 year:2023 number:6 day:06 month:07 pages:1505-1516 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Pile capacity Cyclic pile load test Settlements Shaft and base capacities |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Indian geotechnical journal |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Madhira, Madhav @@aut@@ Kota, Vijay Kiran @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-07-06T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
739212354 |
id |
SPR053700163 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053700163</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231111064654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231111s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053700163</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Madhira, Madhav</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pile capacity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cyclic pile load test</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Settlements</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shaft and base capacities</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kota, Vijay Kiran</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian geotechnical journal</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)739212354</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2707502-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2277-3347</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:06</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1505-1516</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">06</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">1505-1516</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Madhira, Madhav |
spellingShingle |
Madhira, Madhav misc Pile capacity misc Cyclic pile load test misc Settlements misc Shaft and base capacities A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results |
authorStr |
Madhira, Madhav |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)739212354 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2277-3347 |
topic_title |
A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results Pile capacity (dpeaa)DE-He213 Cyclic pile load test (dpeaa)DE-He213 Settlements (dpeaa)DE-He213 Shaft and base capacities (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Pile capacity misc Cyclic pile load test misc Settlements misc Shaft and base capacities |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Pile capacity misc Cyclic pile load test misc Settlements misc Shaft and base capacities |
topic_browse |
misc Pile capacity misc Cyclic pile load test misc Settlements misc Shaft and base capacities |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Indian geotechnical journal |
hierarchy_parent_id |
739212354 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Indian geotechnical journal |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)739212354 (DE-600)2707502-3 |
title |
A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR053700163 (SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e |
title_full |
A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results |
author_sort |
Madhira, Madhav |
journal |
Indian geotechnical journal |
journalStr |
Indian geotechnical journal |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
1505 |
author_browse |
Madhira, Madhav Kota, Vijay Kiran |
container_volume |
53 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Madhira, Madhav |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 |
title_sort |
novel method to predict shaft and base responses of a pile from cyclic pile load test results |
title_auth |
A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results |
abstract |
Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 |
abstractGer |
Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
6 |
title_short |
A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Kota, Vijay Kiran |
author2Str |
Kota, Vijay Kiran |
ppnlink |
739212354 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:23:54.489Z |
_version_ |
1803594586644283392 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053700163</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231111064654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231111s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053700163</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s40098-023-00753-0-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Madhira, Madhav</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Novel Method to Predict Shaft and Base Responses of a Pile from Cyclic Pile Load Test Results</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Geotechnical Society 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The ultimate capacity of the pile foundation is estimated using criteria such as overburden pressure and the strengths and unit weights of the soil layers. The assessment of a pile's axial capacity entails a great deal of uncertainty in choosing the right design parameters, and design principles aren't always in accordance with the processes/procedures involved in installation. The estimated capacity may differ with actual one as values of strength, stiffness, interface resistance between pile and soil and lateral earth pressure coefficient with depth and soil stratification could be different from the values estimated from prior testing or assumed. An initial monotonic or cyclic pile load test is often performed to validate the predicted capacity. Validation often involves ascertaining the design estimate even if the observed settlement at the design load is very small. No attempt was made to evaluate ultimate or design shaft and base resistances. It is possible to estimate the same in some limited cases from the cyclic pile load tests but rarely are those validated. Due to the aforementioned discrepancies of usual practice, a novel method for back-analyzing and estimating ultimate base and shaft resistances, as well as initial stiffnesses of the shaft and base of the pile, based on the load–displacement response from monotonic or cyclic pile load tests, is presented. The topic is momentous as current design methods often largely underestimate the capacity of piles, resulting in an over-conservative design. The proposed approach permits verification of the a-priori predictions based on geotechnical parameters, geometry (shape, length and diameter), construction methodology and other uncertainties involved at site during installation of the pile. The proposed approach is based on an iterative procedure by deploying hyperbolic relationships for the nonlinear responses of shaft and base resistances of the pile response. The pile–soil system is modeled in terms of Winkler model with different nonlinear responses for the shaft-soil and base resistances. The capability of the procedure to predict shaft and base stiffnesses and ultimate shaft and base resistances is checked against data from full-scale cyclic pile load test for validation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pile capacity</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cyclic pile load test</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Settlements</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Shaft and base capacities</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kota, Vijay Kiran</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Indian geotechnical journal</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">53(2023), 6 vom: 06. Juli, Seite 1505-1516</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)739212354</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2707502-3</subfield><subfield code="x">2277-3347</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:53</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">day:06</subfield><subfield code="g">month:07</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1505-1516</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00753-0</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">53</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="b">06</subfield><subfield code="c">07</subfield><subfield code="h">1505-1516</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3992977 |