Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example
Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical as...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jin, Sameer Omer [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2023 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s) 2023 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: EJNMMI Research - Berlin : Springer, 2011, 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:13 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; day:15 ; month:11 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR053742168 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR053742168 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231115064705.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231115s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR053742168 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Jin, Sameer Omer |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s) 2023 | ||
520 | |a Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Harmonisation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Anomaly detection |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Interscanner differences |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Smoothness |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Mérida, Inés |0 (orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Stavropoulos, Ioannis |0 (orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Elwes, Robert D. C. |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lam, Tanya |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Guedj, Eric |0 (orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Girard, Nadine |0 (orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Costes, Nicolas |0 (orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hammers, Alexander |0 (orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t EJNMMI Research |d Berlin : Springer, 2011 |g 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. |w (DE-627)664970265 |w (DE-600)2619892-7 |x 2191-219X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:11 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 15 |c 11 |
author_variant |
s o j so soj i m im i s is r d c e rdc rdce t l tl e g eg n g ng n c nc a h ah |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:2191219X:2023----::hrceiainfnvl8fgriptaaaencmiainihscndtbsfrpiiigeetoofclboml |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
publishDate |
2023 |
allfields |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z doi (DE-627)SPR053742168 (SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jin, Sameer Omer verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735 aut Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Harmonisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anomaly detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interscanner differences (dpeaa)DE-He213 Smoothness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mérida, Inés (orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684 aut Stavropoulos, Ioannis (orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826 aut Elwes, Robert D. C. aut Lam, Tanya (orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727 aut Guedj, Eric (orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132 aut Girard, Nadine (orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275 aut Costes, Nicolas (orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262 aut Hammers, Alexander (orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848 aut Enthalten in EJNMMI Research Berlin : Springer, 2011 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. (DE-627)664970265 (DE-600)2619892-7 2191-219X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1 day:15 month:11 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1 15 11 |
spelling |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z doi (DE-627)SPR053742168 (SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jin, Sameer Omer verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735 aut Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Harmonisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anomaly detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interscanner differences (dpeaa)DE-He213 Smoothness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mérida, Inés (orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684 aut Stavropoulos, Ioannis (orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826 aut Elwes, Robert D. C. aut Lam, Tanya (orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727 aut Guedj, Eric (orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132 aut Girard, Nadine (orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275 aut Costes, Nicolas (orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262 aut Hammers, Alexander (orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848 aut Enthalten in EJNMMI Research Berlin : Springer, 2011 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. (DE-627)664970265 (DE-600)2619892-7 2191-219X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1 day:15 month:11 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1 15 11 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z doi (DE-627)SPR053742168 (SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jin, Sameer Omer verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735 aut Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Harmonisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anomaly detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interscanner differences (dpeaa)DE-He213 Smoothness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mérida, Inés (orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684 aut Stavropoulos, Ioannis (orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826 aut Elwes, Robert D. C. aut Lam, Tanya (orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727 aut Guedj, Eric (orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132 aut Girard, Nadine (orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275 aut Costes, Nicolas (orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262 aut Hammers, Alexander (orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848 aut Enthalten in EJNMMI Research Berlin : Springer, 2011 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. (DE-627)664970265 (DE-600)2619892-7 2191-219X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1 day:15 month:11 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1 15 11 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z doi (DE-627)SPR053742168 (SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jin, Sameer Omer verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735 aut Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Harmonisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anomaly detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interscanner differences (dpeaa)DE-He213 Smoothness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mérida, Inés (orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684 aut Stavropoulos, Ioannis (orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826 aut Elwes, Robert D. C. aut Lam, Tanya (orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727 aut Guedj, Eric (orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132 aut Girard, Nadine (orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275 aut Costes, Nicolas (orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262 aut Hammers, Alexander (orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848 aut Enthalten in EJNMMI Research Berlin : Springer, 2011 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. (DE-627)664970265 (DE-600)2619892-7 2191-219X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1 day:15 month:11 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1 15 11 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z doi (DE-627)SPR053742168 (SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Jin, Sameer Omer verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735 aut Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2023 Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Harmonisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anomaly detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interscanner differences (dpeaa)DE-He213 Smoothness (dpeaa)DE-He213 Mérida, Inés (orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684 aut Stavropoulos, Ioannis (orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826 aut Elwes, Robert D. C. aut Lam, Tanya (orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727 aut Guedj, Eric (orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132 aut Girard, Nadine (orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275 aut Costes, Nicolas (orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262 aut Hammers, Alexander (orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848 aut Enthalten in EJNMMI Research Berlin : Springer, 2011 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. (DE-627)664970265 (DE-600)2619892-7 2191-219X nnns volume:13 year:2023 number:1 day:15 month:11 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 13 2023 1 15 11 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in EJNMMI Research 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. volume:13 year:2023 number:1 day:15 month:11 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in EJNMMI Research 13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov. volume:13 year:2023 number:1 day:15 month:11 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) Harmonisation Anomaly detection Interscanner differences Smoothness |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
EJNMMI Research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jin, Sameer Omer @@aut@@ Mérida, Inés @@aut@@ Stavropoulos, Ioannis @@aut@@ Elwes, Robert D. C. @@aut@@ Lam, Tanya @@aut@@ Guedj, Eric @@aut@@ Girard, Nadine @@aut@@ Costes, Nicolas @@aut@@ Hammers, Alexander @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-11-15T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
664970265 |
id |
SPR053742168 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053742168</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231115064705.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231115s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053742168</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin, Sameer Omer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Statistical parametric mapping (SPM)</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Harmonisation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anomaly detection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interscanner differences</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Smoothness</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mérida, Inés</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stavropoulos, Ioannis</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elwes, Robert D. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lam, Tanya</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guedj, Eric</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Girard, Nadine</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Costes, Nicolas</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hammers, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">EJNMMI Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)664970265</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2619892-7</subfield><subfield code="x">2191-219X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Jin, Sameer Omer |
spellingShingle |
Jin, Sameer Omer misc Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) misc Harmonisation misc Anomaly detection misc Interscanner differences misc Smoothness Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example |
authorStr |
Jin, Sameer Omer |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)664970265 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2191-219X |
topic_title |
Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) (dpeaa)DE-He213 Harmonisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 Anomaly detection (dpeaa)DE-He213 Interscanner differences (dpeaa)DE-He213 Smoothness (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
misc Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) misc Harmonisation misc Anomaly detection misc Interscanner differences misc Smoothness |
topic_unstemmed |
misc Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) misc Harmonisation misc Anomaly detection misc Interscanner differences misc Smoothness |
topic_browse |
misc Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) misc Harmonisation misc Anomaly detection misc Interscanner differences misc Smoothness |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
EJNMMI Research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
664970265 |
hierarchy_top_title |
EJNMMI Research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)664970265 (DE-600)2619892-7 |
title |
Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR053742168 (SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e |
title_full |
Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example |
author_sort |
Jin, Sameer Omer |
journal |
EJNMMI Research |
journalStr |
EJNMMI Research |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2023 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Jin, Sameer Omer Mérida, Inés Stavropoulos, Ioannis Elwes, Robert D. C. Lam, Tanya Guedj, Eric Girard, Nadine Costes, Nicolas Hammers, Alexander |
container_volume |
13 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jin, Sameer Omer |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-1643-2735 (ORCID)0000-0003-1436-4684 (ORCID)0000-0002-6920-1826 (ORCID)0000-0001-6986-7727 (ORCID)0000-0003-1912-6132 (ORCID)0000-0001-8639-9275 (ORCID)0000-0002-2954-9262 (ORCID)0000-0001-9530-4848 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735 (orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684 (orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826 (orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727 (orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132 (orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275 (orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262 (orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848 |
title_sort |
characterisation of a novel [18f]fdg brain pet database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example |
title_auth |
Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example |
abstract |
Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. © The Author(s) 2023 |
abstractGer |
Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. © The Author(s) 2023 |
abstract_unstemmed |
Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation. © The Author(s) 2023 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Mérida, Inés Stavropoulos, Ioannis Elwes, Robert D. C. Lam, Tanya Guedj, Eric Girard, Nadine Costes, Nicolas Hammers, Alexander |
author2Str |
Mérida, Inés Stavropoulos, Ioannis Elwes, Robert D. C. Lam, Tanya Guedj, Eric Girard, Nadine Costes, Nicolas Hammers, Alexander |
ppnlink |
664970265 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:42:18.808Z |
_version_ |
1803595744604585984 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR053742168</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231115064705.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">231115s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR053742168</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s13550-023-01023-z-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jin, Sameer Omer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1643-2735</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Characterisation of a novel [18F]FDG brain PET database and combination with a second database for optimising detection of focal abnormalities, using focal cortical dysplasia as an example</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Brain [18F]FDG PET is used clinically mainly in the presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery and in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders. While scans are usually interpreted visually on an individual basis, comparison against normative cohorts allows statistical assessment of abnormalities and potentially higher sensitivity for detecting abnormalities. Little work has been done on out-of-sample databases (acquired differently to the patient data). Combination of different databases would potentially allow better power and discrimination. We fully characterised an unpublished healthy control brain [18F]FDG PET database (Marseille, n = 60, ages 21–78 years) and compared it to another publicly available database (MRXFDG, n = 37, ages 23–65 years). We measured and then harmonised spatial resolution and global values. A collection of patient scans (n = 34, 13–48 years) with histologically confirmed focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) obtained on three generations of scanners was used to estimate abnormality detection rates using standard software (statistical parametric mapping, SPM12). Results Regional SUVs showed similar patterns, but global values and resolutions were different as expected. Detection rates for the FCDs were 50% for comparison with the Marseille database and 53% for MRXFDG. Simply combining both databases worsened the detection rate to 41%. After harmonisation of spatial resolution, using a full factorial design matrix to accommodate global differences, and leaving out controls older than 60 years, we achieved detection rates of up to 71% for both databases combined. Detection rates were similar across the three scanner types used for patients, and high for patients whose MRI had been normal (n = 10/11). Conclusions As expected, global and regional data characteristics are database specific. However, our work shows the value of increasing database size and suggests ways in which database differences can be overcome. This may inform analysis via traditional statistics or machine learning, and clinical implementation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Statistical parametric mapping (SPM)</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Harmonisation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anomaly detection</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Interscanner differences</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Smoothness</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mérida, Inés</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1436-4684</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stavropoulos, Ioannis</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6920-1826</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elwes, Robert D. C.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lam, Tanya</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6986-7727</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guedj, Eric</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1912-6132</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Girard, Nadine</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-8639-9275</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Costes, Nicolas</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-2954-9262</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hammers, Alexander</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9530-4848</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">EJNMMI Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Berlin : Springer, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">13(2023), 1 vom: 15. Nov.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)664970265</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2619892-7</subfield><subfield code="x">2191-219X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:13</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01023-z</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">13</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3998213 |