Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis
Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Li...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Pan, Tianfan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Revista de oncología - Barcelona : Doyma, 2000, 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:26 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; day:16 ; month:06 ; pages:155-170 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
SPR054226651 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | SPR054226651 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240103064850.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240103s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)SPR054226651 | ||
| 035 | |a (SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pan, Tianfan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. | ||
| 520 | |a Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Spontaneous rupture |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hepatocellular carcinoma |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Transarterial embolization |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Emergency hepatectomy |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gao, Feng |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Xiangzhong |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xu, Xinjian |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Revista de oncología |d Barcelona : Doyma, 2000 |g 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 |w (DE-627)385985452 |w (DE-600)2143451-7 |x 1578-195X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:16 |g month:06 |g pages:155-170 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 26 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 16 |c 06 |h 155-170 | ||
| author_variant |
t p tp f g fg x h xh x x xx |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:1578195X:2023----::rnatraeblztofloebsaehptcoyessmrechptcoy |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| allfields |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 doi (DE-627)SPR054226651 (SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pan, Tianfan verfasserin aut Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. Spontaneous rupture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hepatocellular carcinoma (dpeaa)DE-He213 Transarterial embolization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency hepatectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gao, Feng aut Huang, Xiangzhong (orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160 aut Xu, Xinjian aut Enthalten in Revista de oncología Barcelona : Doyma, 2000 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 (DE-627)385985452 (DE-600)2143451-7 1578-195X nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:1 day:16 month:06 pages:155-170 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 26 2023 1 16 06 155-170 |
| spelling |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 doi (DE-627)SPR054226651 (SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pan, Tianfan verfasserin aut Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. Spontaneous rupture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hepatocellular carcinoma (dpeaa)DE-He213 Transarterial embolization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency hepatectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gao, Feng aut Huang, Xiangzhong (orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160 aut Xu, Xinjian aut Enthalten in Revista de oncología Barcelona : Doyma, 2000 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 (DE-627)385985452 (DE-600)2143451-7 1578-195X nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:1 day:16 month:06 pages:155-170 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 26 2023 1 16 06 155-170 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 doi (DE-627)SPR054226651 (SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pan, Tianfan verfasserin aut Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. Spontaneous rupture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hepatocellular carcinoma (dpeaa)DE-He213 Transarterial embolization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency hepatectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gao, Feng aut Huang, Xiangzhong (orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160 aut Xu, Xinjian aut Enthalten in Revista de oncología Barcelona : Doyma, 2000 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 (DE-627)385985452 (DE-600)2143451-7 1578-195X nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:1 day:16 month:06 pages:155-170 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 26 2023 1 16 06 155-170 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 doi (DE-627)SPR054226651 (SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pan, Tianfan verfasserin aut Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. Spontaneous rupture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hepatocellular carcinoma (dpeaa)DE-He213 Transarterial embolization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency hepatectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gao, Feng aut Huang, Xiangzhong (orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160 aut Xu, Xinjian aut Enthalten in Revista de oncología Barcelona : Doyma, 2000 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 (DE-627)385985452 (DE-600)2143451-7 1578-195X nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:1 day:16 month:06 pages:155-170 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 26 2023 1 16 06 155-170 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 doi (DE-627)SPR054226651 (SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Pan, Tianfan verfasserin aut Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. Spontaneous rupture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hepatocellular carcinoma (dpeaa)DE-He213 Transarterial embolization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency hepatectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gao, Feng aut Huang, Xiangzhong (orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160 aut Xu, Xinjian aut Enthalten in Revista de oncología Barcelona : Doyma, 2000 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 (DE-627)385985452 (DE-600)2143451-7 1578-195X nnns volume:26 year:2023 number:1 day:16 month:06 pages:155-170 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 AR 26 2023 1 16 06 155-170 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Revista de oncología 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 volume:26 year:2023 number:1 day:16 month:06 pages:155-170 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Revista de oncología 26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170 volume:26 year:2023 number:1 day:16 month:06 pages:155-170 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Spontaneous rupture Hepatocellular carcinoma Transarterial embolization Emergency hepatectomy Meta-analysis |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Revista de oncología |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pan, Tianfan @@aut@@ Gao, Feng @@aut@@ Huang, Xiangzhong @@aut@@ Xu, Xinjian @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-06-16T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
385985452 |
| id |
SPR054226651 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054226651</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240103064850.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240103s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054226651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pan, Tianfan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spontaneous rupture</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hepatocellular carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transarterial embolization</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency hepatectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Feng</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Xiangzhong</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Xinjian</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista de oncología</subfield><subfield code="d">Barcelona : Doyma, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)385985452</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2143451-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1578-195X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:155-170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">155-170</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Pan, Tianfan |
| spellingShingle |
Pan, Tianfan misc Spontaneous rupture misc Hepatocellular carcinoma misc Transarterial embolization misc Emergency hepatectomy misc Meta-analysis Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis |
| authorStr |
Pan, Tianfan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)385985452 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
springer |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1578-195X |
| topic_title |
Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis Spontaneous rupture (dpeaa)DE-He213 Hepatocellular carcinoma (dpeaa)DE-He213 Transarterial embolization (dpeaa)DE-He213 Emergency hepatectomy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Meta-analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
| topic |
misc Spontaneous rupture misc Hepatocellular carcinoma misc Transarterial embolization misc Emergency hepatectomy misc Meta-analysis |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Spontaneous rupture misc Hepatocellular carcinoma misc Transarterial embolization misc Emergency hepatectomy misc Meta-analysis |
| topic_browse |
misc Spontaneous rupture misc Hepatocellular carcinoma misc Transarterial embolization misc Emergency hepatectomy misc Meta-analysis |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Revista de oncología |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
385985452 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Revista de oncología |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)385985452 (DE-600)2143451-7 |
| title |
Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR054226651 (SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e |
| title_full |
Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis |
| author_sort |
Pan, Tianfan |
| journal |
Revista de oncología |
| journalStr |
Revista de oncología |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2023 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
155 |
| author_browse |
Pan, Tianfan Gao, Feng Huang, Xiangzhong Xu, Xinjian |
| container_volume |
26 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Pan, Tianfan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-4141-6160 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160 |
| title_sort |
transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured hcc: a meta-analysis |
| title_auth |
Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis |
| abstract |
Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| abstractGer |
Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis |
| url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Gao, Feng Huang, Xiangzhong Xu, Xinjian |
| author2Str |
Gao, Feng Huang, Xiangzhong Xu, Xinjian |
| ppnlink |
385985452 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:34:17.078Z |
| _version_ |
1803606564094869504 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054226651</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240103064850.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240103s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054226651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12094-023-03232-3-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pan, Tianfan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Transarterial embolization followed by staged hepatectomy versus emergency hepatectomy for ruptured HCC: a meta-analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background To compare the efficacy and safety between emergency hepatectomy (EH) and emergency transarterial embolization (TAE) followed by staged hepatectomy (SH) in the treatment of spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC). Methods Databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrial.gov, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP) were searched for all relevant comparative studies from January 2000 to October 2020. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. Subgroup analyses based on the kind of embolization were conducted. RevMan 5.3 software was adopted for meta-analysis. Results Eighteen studies with 871 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis, 448 in EH group and 423 in TAE + SH group. No significant difference was observed in successful hemostasis (P = 0.42), postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.12), complication rate (P = 0.08) between EH and TAE + SH group. However, TAE + SH group was associated with shorter operating time (P < 0.00001), fewer perioperative blood loss (P = 0.007), fewer blood transfusion (P = 0.003), lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.00001) and higher 1-year survival as well as 3-year survival (P < 0.0001; P = 0.003) compared with EH group. Conclusion Compared with EH, TAE + SH could reduce perioperative operating time, blood loss, blood transfusion, mortality rate and increase the long-term survival rate of the rHCC patients, which may be a better treatment for resectable rHCC.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Spontaneous rupture</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hepatocellular carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transarterial embolization</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Emergency hepatectomy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Meta-analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Feng</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Xiangzhong</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4141-6160</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Xinjian</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista de oncología</subfield><subfield code="d">Barcelona : Doyma, 2000</subfield><subfield code="g">26(2023), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 155-170</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)385985452</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2143451-7</subfield><subfield code="x">1578-195X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:26</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:16</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:155-170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03232-3</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">26</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">16</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">155-170</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000244 |