Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach

Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar [verfasserIn] Ray, Bankim Chandra

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	alignment finite element analysis incident strain split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) striker bar

Anmerkung:	© ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of materials engineering and performance - New York, NY : Springer, 1992, 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:33 ; year:2023 ; number:1 ; day:22 ; month:02 ; pages:463-474

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w

Katalog-ID:	SPR054279437

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	SPR054279437
003	DE-627
005	20240106064638.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240106s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR054279437
035			\|a (SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Prusty, Rajesh Kumar \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
520			\|a Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause.
650		4	\|a alignment \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a finite element analysis \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a incident strain \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a striker bar \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Ray, Bankim Chandra \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Journal of materials engineering and performance \|d New York, NY : Springer, 1992 \|g 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 \|w (DE-627)329975447 \|w (DE-600)2048384-3 \|x 1544-1024 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:33 \|g year:2023 \|g number:1 \|g day:22 \|g month:02 \|g pages:463-474
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w \|z lizenzpflichtig \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_120
912			\|a GBV_ILN_138
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_250
912			\|a GBV_ILN_281
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_636
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2039
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2093
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2144
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2188
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2472
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2548
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4246
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4328
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 33 \|j 2023 \|e 1 \|b 22 \|c 02 \|h 463-474

Indexfelder

author_variant	r k p rk rkp b c r bc bcr
matchkey_str	article:15441024:2023----::niettanussniiiynpihpisnrsueatsigeufraibeodtos
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w doi (DE-627)SPR054279437 (SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Prusty, Rajesh Kumar verfasserin aut Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. alignment (dpeaa)DE-He213 finite element analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 incident strain (dpeaa)DE-He213 split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) (dpeaa)DE-He213 striker bar (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ray, Bankim Chandra aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance New York, NY : Springer, 1992 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 (DE-627)329975447 (DE-600)2048384-3 1544-1024 nnns volume:33 year:2023 number:1 day:22 month:02 pages:463-474 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2023 1 22 02 463-474
spelling	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w doi (DE-627)SPR054279437 (SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Prusty, Rajesh Kumar verfasserin aut Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. alignment (dpeaa)DE-He213 finite element analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 incident strain (dpeaa)DE-He213 split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) (dpeaa)DE-He213 striker bar (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ray, Bankim Chandra aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance New York, NY : Springer, 1992 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 (DE-627)329975447 (DE-600)2048384-3 1544-1024 nnns volume:33 year:2023 number:1 day:22 month:02 pages:463-474 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2023 1 22 02 463-474
allfields_unstemmed	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w doi (DE-627)SPR054279437 (SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Prusty, Rajesh Kumar verfasserin aut Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. alignment (dpeaa)DE-He213 finite element analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 incident strain (dpeaa)DE-He213 split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) (dpeaa)DE-He213 striker bar (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ray, Bankim Chandra aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance New York, NY : Springer, 1992 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 (DE-627)329975447 (DE-600)2048384-3 1544-1024 nnns volume:33 year:2023 number:1 day:22 month:02 pages:463-474 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2023 1 22 02 463-474
allfieldsGer	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w doi (DE-627)SPR054279437 (SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Prusty, Rajesh Kumar verfasserin aut Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. alignment (dpeaa)DE-He213 finite element analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 incident strain (dpeaa)DE-He213 split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) (dpeaa)DE-He213 striker bar (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ray, Bankim Chandra aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance New York, NY : Springer, 1992 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 (DE-627)329975447 (DE-600)2048384-3 1544-1024 nnns volume:33 year:2023 number:1 day:22 month:02 pages:463-474 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2023 1 22 02 463-474
allfieldsSound	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w doi (DE-627)SPR054279437 (SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Prusty, Rajesh Kumar verfasserin aut Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. alignment (dpeaa)DE-He213 finite element analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 incident strain (dpeaa)DE-He213 split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) (dpeaa)DE-He213 striker bar (dpeaa)DE-He213 Ray, Bankim Chandra aut Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance New York, NY : Springer, 1992 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 (DE-627)329975447 (DE-600)2048384-3 1544-1024 nnns volume:33 year:2023 number:1 day:22 month:02 pages:463-474 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w lizenzpflichtig Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2023 1 22 02 463-474
language	English
source	Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 volume:33 year:2023 number:1 day:22 month:02 pages:463-474
sourceStr	Enthalten in Journal of materials engineering and performance 33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474 volume:33 year:2023 number:1 day:22 month:02 pages:463-474
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	alignment finite element analysis incident strain split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) striker bar
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Journal of materials engineering and performance
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar @@aut@@ Ray, Bankim Chandra @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-02-22T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	329975447
id	SPR054279437
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054279437</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240106064638.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240106s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054279437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prusty, Rajesh Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alignment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">finite element analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">incident strain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB)</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">striker bar</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ray, Bankim Chandra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials engineering and performance</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)329975447</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048384-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1544-1024</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:22</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:463-474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">22</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">463-474</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar
spellingShingle	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar misc alignment misc finite element analysis misc incident strain misc split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) misc striker bar Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach
authorStr	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)329975447
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1544-1024
topic_title	Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach alignment (dpeaa)DE-He213 finite element analysis (dpeaa)DE-He213 incident strain (dpeaa)DE-He213 split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) (dpeaa)DE-He213 striker bar (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	misc alignment misc finite element analysis misc incident strain misc split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) misc striker bar
topic_unstemmed	misc alignment misc finite element analysis misc incident strain misc split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) misc striker bar
topic_browse	misc alignment misc finite element analysis misc incident strain misc split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) misc striker bar
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of materials engineering and performance
hierarchy_parent_id	329975447
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of materials engineering and performance
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)329975447 (DE-600)2048384-3
title	Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR054279437 (SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e
title_full	Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach
author_sort	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar
journal	Journal of materials engineering and performance
journalStr	Journal of materials engineering and performance
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	463
author_browse	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar Ray, Bankim Chandra
container_volume	33
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Prusty, Rajesh Kumar
doi_str_mv	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w
title_sort	incident strain pulse sensitivity in split hopkinson pressure bar testing setup for variable conditions: a numerical and statistical approach
title_auth	Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach
abstract	Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
abstractGer	Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause. © ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w
remote_bool	true
author2	Ray, Bankim Chandra
author2Str	Ray, Bankim Chandra
ppnlink	329975447
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w
up_date	2024-07-04T00:50:42.147Z
_version_	1803607597018775552
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054279437</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240106064638.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240106s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054279437</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s11665-023-07963-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Prusty, Rajesh Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© ASM International 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract The dynamic behaviour of different materials has been widely studied using the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing. The striker bar's velocity ($ S_{V} $) and the incident bar's impact surface are well known to have a significant impact on producing a clear signal in the compressive SHPB studies. Several times, the shape of the incident strain signal differs from an ideal state, and the reason is difficult to find. In this paper, a parametric investigation of such understudied instances is carried out utilising Abaqus software for finite element analysis (FEA). The numerically obtained incident strain pulse for a perfectly aligned SHPB setup with different $ S_{V} $ was validated experimentally on compressive SHPB apparatus. The numerical output was found to have good agreement with experimental results. Further, plots of incident strain were evaluated numerically for $ S_{v} $ (10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 in m/s) which was used for polynomial fitting using MATLAB's curve fitting tool. A similar method was adopted for symmetrically plane non-parallel impact surface on the incident bar. The angles chosen for FEA calculations were 5°, 10°, 15° and 20°. Filleted impact surface with radius (r) 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm was also studied. The study of the variation of impact surface shape was done at a striker velocity of 25 m/s. It was observed from this study that when striker velocity increases, the absolute magnitude of incident strain at peak increases while rise time remained constant. In turn, when the symmetrically non-parallel plane surface angle and fillet radius grow, the absolute value of incident strain at peak almost stays the same but the rising time lengthens. This study can help understand the nature and discrepancy of the incident strain signal obtained in the compressive SHPB setup and find its root cause.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">alignment</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">finite element analysis</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">incident strain</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB)</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">striker bar</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ray, Bankim Chandra</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of materials engineering and performance</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Springer, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2023), 1 vom: 22. Feb., Seite 463-474</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)329975447</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048384-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1544-1024</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:22</subfield><subfield code="g">month:02</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:463-474</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07963-w</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">22</subfield><subfield code="c">02</subfield><subfield code="h">463-474</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399474

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Incident Strain Pulse Sensitivity in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing Setup for Variable Conditions: A Numerical and Statistical Approach

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?