P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study

Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study,...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Alivon, M. [verfasserIn] Bozec, E. Herbert, A. Laurent, S. Boutouyrie, P.

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2011

Anmerkung:	© Atlantis Press 2011

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Artery research - Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006, 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:5 ; year:2011 ; number:4 ; day:29 ; month:11 ; pages:177-177

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103

Katalog-ID:	SPR054845130

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	SPR054845130
003	DE-627
005	20240221064716.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240221s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR054845130
035			\|a (SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Alivon, M. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study
264		1	\|c 2011
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © Atlantis Press 2011
520			\|a Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients.
700	1		\|a Bozec, E. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Herbert, A. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Laurent, S. \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Boutouyrie, P. \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Artery research \|d Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 \|g 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 \|w (DE-627)534057489 \|w (DE-600)2364789-9 \|x 1876-4401 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:5 \|g year:2011 \|g number:4 \|g day:29 \|g month:11 \|g pages:177-177
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 5 \|j 2011 \|e 4 \|b 29 \|c 11 \|h 177-177

Indexfelder

author_variant	m a ma e b eb a h ah s l sl p b pb
matchkey_str	article:18764401:2011----::68oprsnfreiltfnsassebatrorpwtatrasifessesdyplntot
hierarchy_sort_str	2011
publishDate	2011
allfields	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 doi (DE-627)SPR054845130 (SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Alivon, M. verfasserin aut P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2011 Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Bozec, E. aut Herbert, A. aut Laurent, S. aut Boutouyrie, P. aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:5 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:11 pages:177-177 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2011 4 29 11 177-177
spelling	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 doi (DE-627)SPR054845130 (SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Alivon, M. verfasserin aut P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2011 Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Bozec, E. aut Herbert, A. aut Laurent, S. aut Boutouyrie, P. aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:5 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:11 pages:177-177 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2011 4 29 11 177-177
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 doi (DE-627)SPR054845130 (SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Alivon, M. verfasserin aut P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2011 Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Bozec, E. aut Herbert, A. aut Laurent, S. aut Boutouyrie, P. aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:5 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:11 pages:177-177 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2011 4 29 11 177-177
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 doi (DE-627)SPR054845130 (SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Alivon, M. verfasserin aut P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2011 Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Bozec, E. aut Herbert, A. aut Laurent, S. aut Boutouyrie, P. aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:5 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:11 pages:177-177 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2011 4 29 11 177-177
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 doi (DE-627)SPR054845130 (SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Alivon, M. verfasserin aut P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study 2011 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2011 Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Bozec, E. aut Herbert, A. aut Laurent, S. aut Boutouyrie, P. aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:5 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:11 pages:177-177 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2011 4 29 11 177-177
language	English
source	Enthalten in Artery research 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 volume:5 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:11 pages:177-177
sourceStr	Enthalten in Artery research 5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177 volume:5 year:2011 number:4 day:29 month:11 pages:177-177
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Artery research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Alivon, M. @@aut@@ Bozec, E. @@aut@@ Herbert, A. @@aut@@ Laurent, S. @@aut@@ Boutouyrie, P. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2011-11-29T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	534057489
id	SPR054845130
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054845130</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240221064716.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240221s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054845130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alivon, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Atlantis Press 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bozec, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herbert, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laurent, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boutouyrie, P.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Artery research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)534057489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2364789-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1876-4401</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:177-177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">177-177</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Alivon, M.
spellingShingle	Alivon, M. P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study
authorStr	Alivon, M.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)534057489
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1876-4401
topic_title	P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Artery research
hierarchy_parent_id	534057489
hierarchy_top_title	Artery research
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9
title	P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR054845130 (SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e
title_full	P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study
author_sort	Alivon, M.
journal	Artery research
journalStr	Artery research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2011
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	177
author_browse	Alivon, M. Bozec, E. Herbert, A. Laurent, S. Boutouyrie, P.
container_volume	5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Alivon, M.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103
title_sort	p6.18: comparison of arterial stiffness assessed by arteriograph with arterial stiffness assessed by applanation tonometry and echotracking: a clinical study
title_auth	P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study
abstract	Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. © Atlantis Press 2011
abstractGer	Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. © Atlantis Press 2011
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. © Atlantis Press 2011
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103
remote_bool	true
author2	Bozec, E. Herbert, A. Laurent, S. Boutouyrie, P.
author2Str	Bozec, E. Herbert, A. Laurent, S. Boutouyrie, P.
ppnlink	534057489
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103
up_date	2024-07-04T03:14:22.177Z
_version_	1803616635776401408
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054845130</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240221064716.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240221s2011 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054845130</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)j.artres.2011.10.103-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alivon, M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Atlantis Press 2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction Large artery stiffness is recognized as a strong, independent marker of cardiovascular risk, mainly through aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). Arteriograph is a new non-invasive oscillometric method, which estimates aortic PWV through brachial pressure wave analysis. In a previous study, Trachet et al. (Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2010) have shown, using a numerical model of arterial tree, that Arteriograph measured a brachial stiffness instead of aortic stiffness. Aim To compare PWV with Arteriograph (Ar PWV) to carotid-femoral PWV (CF PWV), carotid-radial PWV (CR PWV) and carotid-humeral PWV (CH PWV). And to compare Ar PWV to carotid stiffness (CS) and humeral stiffness (HS). Methods CF, CH, and CR PWV were assessed by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor®). Ar PWV was assessed by Arteriograph and CS, HS were assessed by echotracking system (Mylab®). Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r, between the methods was calculated. Results 43 subjects were included: 20 healthy subjects and 23 patients with essential hypertension. The correlation between CF PWV and Ar PWV is good and significant in healthy subjects and all subjects (r=0.77 and r=0.76 respectively p<0.001), and weak but not significant in hypertensive subjects. The same with CS in all subjects only (r=0.72, p<0.001) There are no significant correlation between Ar PWV and CH PWV, CR PWV, HS. Conclusion Arteriograph is well correlated with CF PWV and CS in all subjects but not with brachial stiffness. Nevertheless, it is necessary to include more subjects in this study to see if the correlation is as well in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bozec, E.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Herbert, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laurent, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Boutouyrie, P.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Artery research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2011), 4 vom: 29. Nov., Seite 177-177</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)534057489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2364789-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1876-4401</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2011</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">day:29</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:177-177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.103</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2011</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="b">29</subfield><subfield code="c">11</subfield><subfield code="h">177-177</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3998795

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

P6.18: Comparison of Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Arteriograph with Arterial Stiffness Assessed by Applanation Tonometry and Echotracking: A Clinical Study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?