P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors
New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient i...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Paini, Anna [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© Atlantis Press 2017 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Artery research - Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006, 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:20 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; month:12 ; pages:108-108 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR054923077 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR054923077 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240227064753.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR054923077 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Paini, Anna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © Atlantis Press 2017 | ||
520 | |a New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Salvetti, Massimo |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Buglione, Michela |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bertacchini, Fabio |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Maruelli, Giulia |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Trevisan, Francesca |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Baushi, Liliana |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Magrini, Stefano Maria |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Muiesan, Maria Lorenza |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Artery research |d Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 |g 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 |w (DE-627)534057489 |w (DE-600)2364789-9 |x 1876-4401 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g month:12 |g pages:108-108 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 20 |j 2017 |e 1 |c 12 |h 108-108 |
author_variant |
a p ap m s ms m b mb f b fb g m gm f t ft l b lb s m m sm smm m l m ml mlm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18764401:2017----::18fetordohrpolreeslihdkn |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 doi (DE-627)SPR054923077 (SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paini, Anna verfasserin aut P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2017 New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. Salvetti, Massimo aut Buglione, Michela aut Bertacchini, Fabio aut Maruelli, Giulia aut Trevisan, Francesca aut Baushi, Liliana aut Magrini, Stefano Maria aut Muiesan, Maria Lorenza aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:20 year:2017 number:1 month:12 pages:108-108 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2017 1 12 108-108 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 doi (DE-627)SPR054923077 (SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paini, Anna verfasserin aut P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2017 New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. Salvetti, Massimo aut Buglione, Michela aut Bertacchini, Fabio aut Maruelli, Giulia aut Trevisan, Francesca aut Baushi, Liliana aut Magrini, Stefano Maria aut Muiesan, Maria Lorenza aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:20 year:2017 number:1 month:12 pages:108-108 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2017 1 12 108-108 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 doi (DE-627)SPR054923077 (SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paini, Anna verfasserin aut P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2017 New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. Salvetti, Massimo aut Buglione, Michela aut Bertacchini, Fabio aut Maruelli, Giulia aut Trevisan, Francesca aut Baushi, Liliana aut Magrini, Stefano Maria aut Muiesan, Maria Lorenza aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:20 year:2017 number:1 month:12 pages:108-108 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2017 1 12 108-108 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 doi (DE-627)SPR054923077 (SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paini, Anna verfasserin aut P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2017 New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. Salvetti, Massimo aut Buglione, Michela aut Bertacchini, Fabio aut Maruelli, Giulia aut Trevisan, Francesca aut Baushi, Liliana aut Magrini, Stefano Maria aut Muiesan, Maria Lorenza aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:20 year:2017 number:1 month:12 pages:108-108 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2017 1 12 108-108 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 doi (DE-627)SPR054923077 (SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Paini, Anna verfasserin aut P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © Atlantis Press 2017 New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. Salvetti, Massimo aut Buglione, Michela aut Bertacchini, Fabio aut Maruelli, Giulia aut Trevisan, Francesca aut Baushi, Liliana aut Magrini, Stefano Maria aut Muiesan, Maria Lorenza aut Enthalten in Artery research Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 (DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 1876-4401 nnns volume:20 year:2017 number:1 month:12 pages:108-108 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 kostenfrei Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 20 2017 1 12 108-108 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Artery research 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 volume:20 year:2017 number:1 month:12 pages:108-108 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Artery research 20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108 volume:20 year:2017 number:1 month:12 pages:108-108 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Artery research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Paini, Anna @@aut@@ Salvetti, Massimo @@aut@@ Buglione, Michela @@aut@@ Bertacchini, Fabio @@aut@@ Maruelli, Giulia @@aut@@ Trevisan, Francesca @@aut@@ Baushi, Liliana @@aut@@ Magrini, Stefano Maria @@aut@@ Muiesan, Maria Lorenza @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-12-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
534057489 |
id |
SPR054923077 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054923077</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240227064753.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054923077</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paini, Anna</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Atlantis Press 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salvetti, Massimo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buglione, Michela</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bertacchini, Fabio</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maruelli, Giulia</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trevisan, Francesca</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baushi, Liliana</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Magrini, Stefano Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muiesan, Maria Lorenza</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Artery research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)534057489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2364789-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1876-4401</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108-108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">108-108</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Paini, Anna |
spellingShingle |
Paini, Anna P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors |
authorStr |
Paini, Anna |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)534057489 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1876-4401 |
topic_title |
P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Artery research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
534057489 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Artery research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)534057489 (DE-600)2364789-9 |
title |
P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR054923077 (SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e |
title_full |
P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors |
author_sort |
Paini, Anna |
journal |
Artery research |
journalStr |
Artery research |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
108 |
author_browse |
Paini, Anna Salvetti, Massimo Buglione, Michela Bertacchini, Fabio Maruelli, Giulia Trevisan, Francesca Baushi, Liliana Magrini, Stefano Maria Muiesan, Maria Lorenza |
container_volume |
20 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Paini, Anna |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 |
title_sort |
p188: effects of radiotherapy on large vessels in hodgkin lymphoma survivors |
title_auth |
P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors |
abstract |
New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. © Atlantis Press 2017 |
abstractGer |
New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. © Atlantis Press 2017 |
abstract_unstemmed |
New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage. © Atlantis Press 2017 |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Salvetti, Massimo Buglione, Michela Bertacchini, Fabio Maruelli, Giulia Trevisan, Francesca Baushi, Liliana Magrini, Stefano Maria Muiesan, Maria Lorenza |
author2Str |
Salvetti, Massimo Buglione, Michela Bertacchini, Fabio Maruelli, Giulia Trevisan, Francesca Baushi, Liliana Magrini, Stefano Maria Muiesan, Maria Lorenza |
ppnlink |
534057489 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T03:31:18.343Z |
_version_ |
1803617701294243840 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR054923077</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240227064753.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240227s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR054923077</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)j.artres.2017.10.189-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Paini, Anna</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P188: Effects of Radiotherapy on Large Vessels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© Atlantis Press 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">New chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy have significantly improved cancer patient’s survival, although the cardiovascular (CV) side effects of cancer treatment are increasingly important. In previous studies, an increased risk of cerebrovascular complications such as stroke and transient ischemic attack was described in patients undergoing neck radiotherapy. Aim To evaluate vascular carotid structural (IMT, plaque) and functional (carotid stiffness) damage, and changes in arterial stiffness (Carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity; cf- PWV) in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors previously treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods We enrolled206 Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (mean age 54 ± 14years, 51%males, mean follow-up of9 ± 6years).CV risk factors were investigated and atherosclerotic carotid damage was assessed by standard carotid ultrasound evaluation for intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement (MeanMax- IMT, CBMax, Tmax; n = 167); in 141 patients radiofrequency-based carotid stiffness analysis (distensibility; distensibility coefficient, DC; compliance coefficient; CC) was also performed.Cf-PWV measurement were obtained in 154 patients. Results A significant correlation between radiotherapy dose and: MeanMax-IMT (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), Tmax (r = 0.20; p < 0.05), distensibility (r = 0.24; p < 0.05), DC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05), CC(r = 0.24; p < 0.05) was observed. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to radiotherapy dose (Dose: 20e30; 31e36; 37–42;>42Gy). An increase in Tmax (1.27 ± 0.61, 1.35 ± 0.59, 1.46 ± 0.69, 1.76 ± 1.12 mm, p for trend <0.05) and in the prevalence of carotid plaque (29%, 31%, 47% and 55%, p for trend <0.05) was observed as related to dose-category. One-hundred-seventeen patients received neck irradiation (67 bilateral; 50 unilateral).In unilaterally irradiated patients, MeanMaxIMT was greater in the irradiated side as compared to unirradiated carotid artery and the difference reached statistical significance in the group of patients who received a high radiotherapy dose (0.97 ± 0.35 vs 0.92 ± 0.34 p < 0.05).Cf-PWV was significantly greater only in patients that received high dose (>42Gy), as compared to all the other dose groups (9.7 ± 2.3 vs 8.3±2.2,8.0 ± 1.5 and 8.3±1.4, p<0.05). Conclusions In this large number of HL survivors, carotid IMT, plaque prevalence and aortic and carotid stiffness were significantly related with radiotherapy doses. Carotid IMT, carotid and aortic stiffness were significantly higher in the irradiated carotid arteries, but only at doses >42Gy, suggesting that there may be a dose threshold for radiotherapy-induced carotid wall damage.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salvetti, Massimo</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buglione, Michela</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bertacchini, Fabio</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maruelli, Giulia</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trevisan, Francesca</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baushi, Liliana</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Magrini, Stefano Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muiesan, Maria Lorenza</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Artery research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Atlantis Press, 2006</subfield><subfield code="g">20(2017), 1 vom: Dez., Seite 108-108</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)534057489</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2364789-9</subfield><subfield code="x">1876-4401</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:20</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:12</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:108-108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2017.10.189</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">20</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="c">12</subfield><subfield code="h">108-108</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4013157 |