Psychometric evaluation of the near activity visual questionnaire presbyopia (NAVQ-P) and additional patient-reported outcome items

Background The Near Visual Acuity Questionnaire Presbyopia (NAVQ-P) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that was developed in a phakic presbyopia population to assess near vision function impacts. The study refined and explored the psychometric properties and score interpretability of the NA...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Background The Near Visual Acuity Questionnaire Presbyopia (NAVQ-P) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that was developed in a phakic presbyopia population to assess near vision function impacts. The study refined and explored the psychometric properties and score interpretability of the NAVQ-P and additional PRO items assessing near vision correction independence (NVCI), near vision satisfaction (NVS), and near vision correction preference (NVCP). Methods This was a psychometric validation study conducted using PRO data collected as part of a Phase IIb clinical trial (CUN8R44 A2202) consisting of 235 randomized adults with presbyopia from the US, Japan, Australia, and Canada. Data collected at baseline, week 2, and months 1, 2, and 3 during the 3-month trial treatment period were included in the analyses to assess item (question) properties, NAVQ-P dimensionality and scoring, reliability, validity, and score interpretation. Results Item responses were distributed across the full response scale for most NAVQ-P and additional PRO items. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the pre-defined unidimensional structure and calculation of a NAVQ-P total score as a measure of near vision function. Item deletion informed by item response distributions, dimensionality analyses, item response theory, and previous qualitative findings, including clinical input, supported retention of 14 NAVQ-P items. The 14-item NAVQ-P total score had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.979) and high test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients > = 0.898). There was good evidence of construct-related validity for all PROs supported by strong correlations with concurrent measures. Excellent results for known-groups validity and ability to detect change analyses were also demonstrated. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods supported interpretation of scores through generation of group-level and within-individual estimates of meaningful change thresholds. A meaningful within-patient change in the range of 8-15-point improvement on the NAVQ-P total score (score range 0–42) was recommended, including a more specific responder definition of 10-point improvement. Conclusions The NAVQ-P, NVCI, and NVS are valid and reliable instruments which have the ability to detect change over time. Findings strongly support the use of these measures as outcome assessments in clinical/research studies and in clinical practice in the presbyopia population. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Autor*in:	Sims, Joel [verfasserIn] Sloesen, Brigitte [verfasserIn] Bentley, Sarah [verfasserIn] Naujoks, Christel [verfasserIn] Arbuckle, Rob [verfasserIn] Chiva-Razavi, Sima [verfasserIn] Pascoe, Ben [verfasserIn] Stochl, Jan [verfasserIn] Findley, Amy [verfasserIn] O’Brien, Paul [verfasserIn] Wolffsohn, James S. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2024

Schlagwörter:	Presbyopia Patient-reported outcome Clinical outcome assessment Psychometric validation Near vision function

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2024

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Journal of patient-reported outcomes - Springer International Publishing, 2017, 8(2024), 1 vom: 09. Apr.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:8 ; year:2024 ; number:1 ; day:09 ; month:04

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s41687-024-00717-9

Katalog-ID:	SPR055473970