Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping
Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The percep...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti [verfasserIn] Sethuramalingam, Prabhu [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2024 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Anmerkung: |
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: International journal of intelligent robotics and applications - Springer Nature Singapore, 2017, 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2024 ; number:3 ; day:20 ; month:06 ; pages:758-786 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
SPR057251606 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | SPR057251606 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240909064616.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240909s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)SPR057251606 | ||
035 | |a (SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |a 670 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |a 670 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Sut, Dhruba Jyoti |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. | ||
520 | |a Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Soft robotics |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Soft pneumatic actuator |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Design optimisation |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a FEM |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
650 | 4 | |a Flexibility |7 (dpeaa)DE-He213 | |
700 | 1 | |a Sethuramalingam, Prabhu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of intelligent robotics and applications |d Springer Nature Singapore, 2017 |g 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 |w (DE-627)876318030 |w (DE-600)2879694-9 |x 2366-598X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g day:20 |g month:06 |g pages:758-786 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w |m X:SPRINGER |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
912 | |a SYSFLAG_0 | ||
912 | |a GBV_SPRINGER | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_171 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_266 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_636 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2039 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2057 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2093 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2107 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2144 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2188 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2446 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2472 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4328 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2024 |e 3 |b 20 |c 06 |h 758-786 |
author_variant |
d j s dj djs p s ps |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:2366598X:2024----::einpiiainnaeprmnaassmnosfata |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2024 |
publishDate |
2024 |
allfields |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w doi (DE-627)SPR057251606 (SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 670 VZ 620 670 VZ Sut, Dhruba Jyoti verfasserin aut Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. Soft robotics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Soft pneumatic actuator (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design optimisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 FEM (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flexibility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sethuramalingam, Prabhu verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of intelligent robotics and applications Springer Nature Singapore, 2017 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 (DE-627)876318030 (DE-600)2879694-9 2366-598X nnns volume:8 year:2024 number:3 day:20 month:06 pages:758-786 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w X:SPRINGER Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2024 3 20 06 758-786 |
spelling |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w doi (DE-627)SPR057251606 (SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 670 VZ 620 670 VZ Sut, Dhruba Jyoti verfasserin aut Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. Soft robotics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Soft pneumatic actuator (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design optimisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 FEM (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flexibility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sethuramalingam, Prabhu verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of intelligent robotics and applications Springer Nature Singapore, 2017 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 (DE-627)876318030 (DE-600)2879694-9 2366-598X nnns volume:8 year:2024 number:3 day:20 month:06 pages:758-786 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w X:SPRINGER Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2024 3 20 06 758-786 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w doi (DE-627)SPR057251606 (SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 670 VZ 620 670 VZ Sut, Dhruba Jyoti verfasserin aut Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. Soft robotics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Soft pneumatic actuator (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design optimisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 FEM (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flexibility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sethuramalingam, Prabhu verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of intelligent robotics and applications Springer Nature Singapore, 2017 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 (DE-627)876318030 (DE-600)2879694-9 2366-598X nnns volume:8 year:2024 number:3 day:20 month:06 pages:758-786 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w X:SPRINGER Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2024 3 20 06 758-786 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w doi (DE-627)SPR057251606 (SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 670 VZ 620 670 VZ Sut, Dhruba Jyoti verfasserin aut Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. Soft robotics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Soft pneumatic actuator (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design optimisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 FEM (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flexibility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sethuramalingam, Prabhu verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of intelligent robotics and applications Springer Nature Singapore, 2017 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 (DE-627)876318030 (DE-600)2879694-9 2366-598X nnns volume:8 year:2024 number:3 day:20 month:06 pages:758-786 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w X:SPRINGER Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2024 3 20 06 758-786 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w doi (DE-627)SPR057251606 (SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 620 670 VZ 620 670 VZ Sut, Dhruba Jyoti verfasserin aut Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. Soft robotics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Soft pneumatic actuator (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design optimisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 FEM (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flexibility (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sethuramalingam, Prabhu verfasserin aut Enthalten in International journal of intelligent robotics and applications Springer Nature Singapore, 2017 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 (DE-627)876318030 (DE-600)2879694-9 2366-598X nnns volume:8 year:2024 number:3 day:20 month:06 pages:758-786 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w X:SPRINGER Resolving-System lizenzpflichtig Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2024 3 20 06 758-786 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in International journal of intelligent robotics and applications 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 volume:8 year:2024 number:3 day:20 month:06 pages:758-786 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in International journal of intelligent robotics and applications 8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786 volume:8 year:2024 number:3 day:20 month:06 pages:758-786 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Soft robotics Soft pneumatic actuator Design optimisation FEM Flexibility |
dewey-raw |
620 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
International journal of intelligent robotics and applications |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti @@aut@@ Sethuramalingam, Prabhu @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2024-06-20T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
876318030 |
dewey-sort |
3620 |
id |
SPR057251606 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR057251606</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240909064616.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240909s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR057251606</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sut, Dhruba Jyoti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soft robotics</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soft pneumatic actuator</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design optimisation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">FEM</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flexibility</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sethuramalingam, Prabhu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of intelligent robotics and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Nature Singapore, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)876318030</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2879694-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2366-598X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:758-786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">758-786</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti |
spellingShingle |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti ddc 620 misc Soft robotics misc Soft pneumatic actuator misc Design optimisation misc FEM misc Flexibility Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping |
authorStr |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)876318030 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
620 - Engineering & allied operations 670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
springer |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2366-598X |
topic_title |
620 670 VZ Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping Soft robotics (dpeaa)DE-He213 Soft pneumatic actuator (dpeaa)DE-He213 Design optimisation (dpeaa)DE-He213 FEM (dpeaa)DE-He213 Flexibility (dpeaa)DE-He213 |
topic |
ddc 620 misc Soft robotics misc Soft pneumatic actuator misc Design optimisation misc FEM misc Flexibility |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 620 misc Soft robotics misc Soft pneumatic actuator misc Design optimisation misc FEM misc Flexibility |
topic_browse |
ddc 620 misc Soft robotics misc Soft pneumatic actuator misc Design optimisation misc FEM misc Flexibility |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
International journal of intelligent robotics and applications |
hierarchy_parent_id |
876318030 |
dewey-tens |
620 - Engineering 670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
International journal of intelligent robotics and applications |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)876318030 (DE-600)2879694-9 |
title |
Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)SPR057251606 (SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e |
title_full |
Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping |
author_sort |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti |
journal |
International journal of intelligent robotics and applications |
journalStr |
International journal of intelligent robotics and applications |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2024 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
758 |
author_browse |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti Sethuramalingam, Prabhu |
container_volume |
8 |
class |
620 670 VZ |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sut, Dhruba Jyoti |
doi_str_mv |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w |
dewey-full |
620 670 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping |
title_auth |
Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping |
abstract |
Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
abstractGer |
Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. |
collection_details |
SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_266 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_636 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2039 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2093 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2107 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2144 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2188 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2472 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4246 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4328 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
3 |
title_short |
Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping |
url |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Sethuramalingam, Prabhu |
author2Str |
Sethuramalingam, Prabhu |
ppnlink |
876318030 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w |
up_date |
2024-09-09T04:47:10.688Z |
_version_ |
1809692471529046016 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR057251606</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240909064616.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240909s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR057251606</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s41315-024-00355-w-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sut, Dhruba Jyoti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design optimisation and an experimental assessment of soft actuator for robotic grasping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Many robotic systems face substantial challenges when trying to grasp and manipulate objects. Thought of initially as humanoid automata a century ago, this viewpoint is still influential in modern robot design. Many robotic grippers are inspired by the deftness of the human hand. The perceptual, processing, and control issues that conventional grippers have are also experienced by soft-fingered grippers. Precise finger placement, dictated by the shape and attitude of the object, is necessary to accomplish force closure when using soft fingertips to grasp. Soft robotic end-effectors have several advantages, such as a good interface with humans, the capacity to adapt to different environments, a number of degrees of freedom, and the ability to non-destructively grasp items of various shapes. Adding to earlier research that looked at the soft robot in a theoretical way, this study creates an optimized model based on the deformation in terms of bending of the channel cavity under applied pneumatic pressure. A correlation between pneumatic pressure and the pneumatic soft actuator's bending angle has been demonstrated. This research looks at how different design factors affect the bending of a multi-chambered soft actuator that is pneumatically networked. The finite element approach involves fine-tuned (optimised) actuator construction. Using FEM to evaluate aspects affecting actuator mechanical output, the ideal design parameters were discovered using DoE, resulting in a bending angle of ~ 104 degrees at 30 kPa. This study used ANOVA at a 5% significant level to identify which variables most affected the pneumatic actuator's deformation (bending angle). The significant R-square value of 96.42% supports the study's conclusions that the parameters utilised explain an immense percentage of bending angle deviations. Experimental verification of the optimized finite element model findings was conducted. The verification of the actuators' bending angles and output forces reveals that the discrepancy between the two sets of data stayed below 9%. Also, the average gripping success rate attained in the grasping evaluation, which involved four distinct types of items, was almost 97%.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soft robotics</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soft pneumatic actuator</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Design optimisation</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">FEM</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Flexibility</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sethuramalingam, Prabhu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">International journal of intelligent robotics and applications</subfield><subfield code="d">Springer Nature Singapore, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2024), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 758-786</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)876318030</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2879694-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2366-598X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:06</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:758-786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41315-024-00355-w</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">lizenzpflichtig</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_266</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2093</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2107</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2144</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4328</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">06</subfield><subfield code="h">758-786</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4004784 |