Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy

Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the rel...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Zhou, Pei [verfasserIn] Sun, Xiong [verfasserIn] Zeng, Liwu [verfasserIn] Zeng, Xinyu [verfasserIn] Xie, Gengchen [verfasserIn] Liu, Xinghua [verfasserIn] Tao, Kaixiong [verfasserIn] Zhang, Peng [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2024

Schlagwörter:	Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy Lymph node ratio Gastric cancer,pathological complete response Pathological complete response

Anmerkung:	© The Author(s) 2024

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: BMC gastroenterology - BioMed Central, 2001, 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt.
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:24 ; year:2024 ; number:1 ; day:19 ; month:10

Links:	Volltext

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x

Katalog-ID:	SPR057916691

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	SPR057916691
003	DE-627
005	20241020064721.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	241020s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)SPR057916691
035			\|a (SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q VZ
084			\|a 44.00 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Zhou, Pei \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
264		1	\|c 2024
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a © The Author(s) 2024
520			\|a Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT.
650		4	\|a Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Lymph node ratio \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Gastric cancer,pathological complete response \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
650		4	\|a Pathological complete response \|7 (dpeaa)DE-He213
700	1		\|a Sun, Xiong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Zeng, Liwu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Zeng, Xinyu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Xie, Gengchen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Liu, Xinghua \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Tao, Kaixiong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Zhang, Peng \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t BMC gastroenterology \|d BioMed Central, 2001 \|g 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. \|w (DE-627)326643702 \|w (DE-600)2041351-8 \|x 1471-230X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:24 \|g year:2024 \|g number:1 \|g day:19 \|g month:10
856	4	0	\|u https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x \|m X:SPRINGER \|x Resolving-System \|z kostenfrei \|3 Volltext
912			\|a SYSFLAG_0
912			\|a GBV_SPRINGER
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_72
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2031
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4029
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4116
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4155
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4318
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 44.00 \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 24 \|j 2024 \|e 1 \|b 19 \|c 10

Indexfelder

author_variant	p z pz x s xs l z lz x z xz g x gx x l xl k t kt p z pz
matchkey_str	article:1471230X:2024----::ypndrtosponsiidctrolclydacdaticneatre
hierarchy_sort_str	2024
bklnumber	44.00
publishDate	2024
allfields	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x doi (DE-627)SPR057916691 (SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.00 bkl Zhou, Pei verfasserin aut Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2024 Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lymph node ratio (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastric cancer,pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sun, Xiong verfasserin aut Zeng, Liwu verfasserin aut Zeng, Xinyu verfasserin aut Xie, Gengchen verfasserin aut Liu, Xinghua verfasserin aut Tao, Kaixiong verfasserin aut Zhang, Peng verfasserin aut Enthalten in BMC gastroenterology BioMed Central, 2001 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. (DE-627)326643702 (DE-600)2041351-8 1471-230X nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:1 day:19 month:10 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4155 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 44.00 VZ AR 24 2024 1 19 10
spelling	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x doi (DE-627)SPR057916691 (SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.00 bkl Zhou, Pei verfasserin aut Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2024 Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lymph node ratio (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastric cancer,pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sun, Xiong verfasserin aut Zeng, Liwu verfasserin aut Zeng, Xinyu verfasserin aut Xie, Gengchen verfasserin aut Liu, Xinghua verfasserin aut Tao, Kaixiong verfasserin aut Zhang, Peng verfasserin aut Enthalten in BMC gastroenterology BioMed Central, 2001 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. (DE-627)326643702 (DE-600)2041351-8 1471-230X nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:1 day:19 month:10 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4155 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 44.00 VZ AR 24 2024 1 19 10
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x doi (DE-627)SPR057916691 (SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.00 bkl Zhou, Pei verfasserin aut Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2024 Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lymph node ratio (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastric cancer,pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sun, Xiong verfasserin aut Zeng, Liwu verfasserin aut Zeng, Xinyu verfasserin aut Xie, Gengchen verfasserin aut Liu, Xinghua verfasserin aut Tao, Kaixiong verfasserin aut Zhang, Peng verfasserin aut Enthalten in BMC gastroenterology BioMed Central, 2001 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. (DE-627)326643702 (DE-600)2041351-8 1471-230X nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:1 day:19 month:10 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4155 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 44.00 VZ AR 24 2024 1 19 10
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x doi (DE-627)SPR057916691 (SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.00 bkl Zhou, Pei verfasserin aut Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2024 Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lymph node ratio (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastric cancer,pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sun, Xiong verfasserin aut Zeng, Liwu verfasserin aut Zeng, Xinyu verfasserin aut Xie, Gengchen verfasserin aut Liu, Xinghua verfasserin aut Tao, Kaixiong verfasserin aut Zhang, Peng verfasserin aut Enthalten in BMC gastroenterology BioMed Central, 2001 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. (DE-627)326643702 (DE-600)2041351-8 1471-230X nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:1 day:19 month:10 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4155 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 44.00 VZ AR 24 2024 1 19 10
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x doi (DE-627)SPR057916691 (SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 VZ 44.00 bkl Zhou, Pei verfasserin aut Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier © The Author(s) 2024 Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lymph node ratio (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastric cancer,pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Sun, Xiong verfasserin aut Zeng, Liwu verfasserin aut Zeng, Xinyu verfasserin aut Xie, Gengchen verfasserin aut Liu, Xinghua verfasserin aut Tao, Kaixiong verfasserin aut Zhang, Peng verfasserin aut Enthalten in BMC gastroenterology BioMed Central, 2001 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. (DE-627)326643702 (DE-600)2041351-8 1471-230X nnns volume:24 year:2024 number:1 day:19 month:10 https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x X:SPRINGER Resolving-System kostenfrei Volltext SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4155 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 44.00 VZ AR 24 2024 1 19 10
language	English
source	Enthalten in BMC gastroenterology 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. volume:24 year:2024 number:1 day:19 month:10
sourceStr	Enthalten in BMC gastroenterology 24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt. volume:24 year:2024 number:1 day:19 month:10
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy Lymph node ratio Gastric cancer,pathological complete response Pathological complete response
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	BMC gastroenterology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Zhou, Pei @@aut@@ Sun, Xiong @@aut@@ Zeng, Liwu @@aut@@ Zeng, Xinyu @@aut@@ Xie, Gengchen @@aut@@ Liu, Xinghua @@aut@@ Tao, Kaixiong @@aut@@ Zhang, Peng @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2024-10-19T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	326643702
dewey-sort	3610
id	SPR057916691
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR057916691</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241020064721.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">241020s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR057916691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Pei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lymph node ratio</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastric cancer,pathological complete response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pathological complete response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Xiong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeng, Liwu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeng, Xinyu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xie, Gengchen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Xinghua</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao, Kaixiong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC gastroenterology</subfield><subfield code="d">BioMed Central, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)326643702</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2041351-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1471-230X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4155</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Zhou, Pei
spellingShingle	Zhou, Pei ddc 610 bkl 44.00 misc Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy misc Lymph node ratio misc Gastric cancer,pathological complete response misc Pathological complete response Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
authorStr	Zhou, Pei
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)326643702
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	springer
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1471-230X
topic_title	610 VZ 44.00 bkl Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (dpeaa)DE-He213 Lymph node ratio (dpeaa)DE-He213 Gastric cancer,pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213 Pathological complete response (dpeaa)DE-He213
topic	ddc 610 bkl 44.00 misc Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy misc Lymph node ratio misc Gastric cancer,pathological complete response misc Pathological complete response
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 bkl 44.00 misc Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy misc Lymph node ratio misc Gastric cancer,pathological complete response misc Pathological complete response
topic_browse	ddc 610 bkl 44.00 misc Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy misc Lymph node ratio misc Gastric cancer,pathological complete response misc Pathological complete response
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	BMC gastroenterology
hierarchy_parent_id	326643702
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	BMC gastroenterology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)326643702 (DE-600)2041351-8
title	Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
ctrlnum	(DE-627)SPR057916691 (SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e
title_full	Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
author_sort	Zhou, Pei
journal	BMC gastroenterology
journalStr	BMC gastroenterology
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2024
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Zhou, Pei Sun, Xiong Zeng, Liwu Zeng, Xinyu Xie, Gengchen Liu, Xinghua Tao, Kaixiong Zhang, Peng
container_volume	24
class	610 VZ 44.00 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Zhou, Pei
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x
dewey-full	610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
title_auth	Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
abstract	Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. © The Author(s) 2024
abstractGer	Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. © The Author(s) 2024
abstract_unstemmed	Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT. © The Author(s) 2024
collection_details	SYSFLAG_0 GBV_SPRINGER SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_72 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2057 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4029 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4116 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4155 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4318 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy
url	https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x
remote_bool	true
author2	Sun, Xiong Zeng, Liwu Zeng, Xinyu Xie, Gengchen Liu, Xinghua Tao, Kaixiong Zhang, Peng
author2Str	Sun, Xiong Zeng, Liwu Zeng, Xinyu Xie, Gengchen Liu, Xinghua Tao, Kaixiong Zhang, Peng
ppnlink	326643702
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x
up_date	2024-10-20T04:49:17.347Z
_version_	1813407079960936448
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">SPR057916691</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241020064721.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">241020s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)SPR057916691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(SPR)s12876-024-03462-x-e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhou, Pei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">© The Author(s) 2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective The efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic indicator in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) remains to be demonstrated. The objective of the current retrospective study is to investigate the relationship between LNR and survival in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 121 cases of LAGC in patients underwent radical resection after NICT between July 2020 and October 2023. The LNR values of the patients were divided into two groups using X-tile software. The first group, designated the low LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of ≤ 33%. The second group, designated the high LNR group, comprised patients with LNR values of > 33%. The correlation between patient survival rates and a range of clinical and pathological variables was examined. Results Overall, 121 patients were enrolled: 108 with low-LNR (LNR ≤ 33%) and 13 with high-LNR (LNR > 33%). A better 2-year overall survival (OS) (88.5% vs. 32.6%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (80.2% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001) were observed in patients with low LNR. A similar result was also found in those with non-pathological complete response group (non-pCR), where the 2-year OS was 87.2% vs. 32.6% (p < 0.001), and the 2-year PFS was 77.7% vs. 23.5% (p < 0.001). Compared to the pathologic lymph nodes staging (ypN), LNR exhibited similar prognostic capabilities for OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR 6.258, 95% CI 1.798–21.778; p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 3.431, 95% CI 1.341–8.780; p = 0.010), but not ypN. Conclusions LNR may serve as a viable indicator for prognostication in LAGC patients treated with NICT.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lymph node ratio</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastric cancer,pathological complete response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pathological complete response</subfield><subfield code="7">(dpeaa)DE-He213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Xiong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeng, Liwu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zeng, Xinyu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xie, Gengchen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Xinghua</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao, Kaixiong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">BMC gastroenterology</subfield><subfield code="d">BioMed Central, 2001</subfield><subfield code="g">24(2024), 1 vom: 19. Okt.</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)326643702</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2041351-8</subfield><subfield code="x">1471-230X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:24</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:19</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03462-x</subfield><subfield code="m">X:SPRINGER</subfield><subfield code="x">Resolving-System</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_SPRINGER</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_72</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2057</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4029</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4155</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4318</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.00</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">24</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">19</subfield><subfield code="c">10</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.402648

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Lymph node ratio is a prognostic indicator for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?